A federal judge denied summary judgment to Toshiba in a case accusing the company and other Japanese and Korean companies of conspiring to fix prices of rechargeable lithium batteries.
The multidistrict lawsuit, transferred to San Francisco in 2013, accuses Samsung, Panasonic, Sanyo, Sony and other major electronics companies of violating federal antitrust law.
In a 7-page order, U.S. District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers rejected Toshiba’s argument that the claims against it are time-barred.
Toshiba said that it withdrew from any alleged conspiracy by the end of 2004 through the sale of its lithium ion cell manufacturing business.
But Rogers said that there is a genuine issue of material fact as to whether the company actually did so, since Toshiba “potentially remained a member of and participated in a battery trade association alongside alleged conspirators.”
She also said that Toshiba “held onto and selectively licensed ‘valuable IP’ relating to lithium ion battery technology” and “discarded certain manufacturing equipment that might have been sold to non-conspirators.”
And “notably, Toshiba admittedly stored cells it had produced prior to selling the manufacturing business, aggregated those cells into battery packs and sold the lithium ion battery packs through at least 2007 – earning nearly $1 million in revenue,” Rogers said.
Full Content: Courthouse News Service
Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.
Featured News
Google’s Bid to End EU Antitrust Case with AdX Sale Rejected by Publishers
Sep 18, 2024 by
CPI
Google Challenges £7 Billion UK Lawsuit, Seeks Case Dismissal Over Alleged Market Abuse
Sep 18, 2024 by
CPI
GameStop CEO Ryan Cohen Fined Nearly $1M for Antitrust Violation in Wells Fargo Deal
Sep 18, 2024 by
CPI
French Regulator Approves FDJ’s Kindred €2.45B Acquisition with Conditions
Sep 18, 2024 by
CPI
UK Competition Authority Targets Greenwashing with New Fashion Compliance Rules
Sep 18, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Canada & Mexico
Sep 3, 2024 by
CPI
Competitive Convergence: Mexico’s 30-Year Quest for Antitrust Parity with its Northern Neighbor
Sep 3, 2024 by
Francisco Javier Núñez Melgoza
Competition and Digital Markets in North America: A Comparative Study of Antitrust Investigations in Mexico and the United States
Sep 3, 2024 by
Julio Garcia
Recent Antitrust Development in Mexico: COFECE’s Preliminary Report on Amazon and Mercado Libre
Sep 3, 2024 by
Alejandra Palacios Prieto
The Cost of Making COFECE Disappear
Sep 3, 2024 by
Mateo Fernández