A federal judge denied summary judgment to Toshiba in a case accusing the company and other Japanese and Korean companies of conspiring to fix prices of rechargeable lithium batteries.
The multidistrict lawsuit, transferred to San Francisco in 2013, accuses Samsung, Panasonic, Sanyo, Sony and other major electronics companies of violating federal antitrust law.
In a 7-page order, U.S. District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers rejected Toshiba’s argument that the claims against it are time-barred.
Toshiba said that it withdrew from any alleged conspiracy by the end of 2004 through the sale of its lithium ion cell manufacturing business.
But Rogers said that there is a genuine issue of material fact as to whether the company actually did so, since Toshiba “potentially remained a member of and participated in a battery trade association alongside alleged conspirators.”
She also said that Toshiba “held onto and selectively licensed ‘valuable IP’ relating to lithium ion battery technology” and “discarded certain manufacturing equipment that might have been sold to non-conspirators.”
And “notably, Toshiba admittedly stored cells it had produced prior to selling the manufacturing business, aggregated those cells into battery packs and sold the lithium ion battery packs through at least 2007 – earning nearly $1 million in revenue,” Rogers said.
Full Content: Courthouse News Service
Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.
Featured News
EU’s Incoming Competition Head Pushes for Policy Shift to Support ‘European Champions
Sep 19, 2024 by
CPI
Google Challenges $217 Million Legal Fee Demand in Privacy Case
Sep 19, 2024 by
CPI
EU Moves to Enforce Apple’s Compliance with New Market Rules
Sep 19, 2024 by
CPI
California Attorney General Bonta Stands Firm Against Albertsons-Kroger Merger
Sep 19, 2024 by
CPI
New FTC Report Highlights Privacy Risks in Social Media Data Use
Sep 19, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Canada & Mexico
Sep 3, 2024 by
CPI
Competitive Convergence: Mexico’s 30-Year Quest for Antitrust Parity with its Northern Neighbor
Sep 3, 2024 by
Francisco Javier Núñez Melgoza
Competition and Digital Markets in North America: A Comparative Study of Antitrust Investigations in Mexico and the United States
Sep 3, 2024 by
Julio Garcia
Recent Antitrust Development in Mexico: COFECE’s Preliminary Report on Amazon and Mercado Libre
Sep 3, 2024 by
Alejandra Palacios Prieto
The Cost of Making COFECE Disappear
Sep 3, 2024 by
Mateo Fernández