Vanderbilt University quarterback Diego Pavia has filed a lawsuit against the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA), arguing that its eligibility rules for junior college athletes are restrictive and anticompetitive. Filed Friday in the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee, Pavia’s suit challenges specific NCAA bylaws he claims unfairly limit junior college athletes’ ability to compete and earn in NCAA Division I sports after transferring, according to Bloomberg.
At the center of Pavia’s case is the NCAA’s “five-year rule,” a bylaw providing collegiate athletes with a five-year period to complete four seasons of play. This rule, also called an “eligibility clock,” starts ticking from the moment a student-athlete enrolls full-time at any collegiate institution—NCAA-affiliated or not. Pavia argues that this structure is problematic for junior college athletes, whose eligibility clock begins at their junior college, leaving them with fewer seasons to play if they transfer to an NCAA school after two years.
Per the lawsuit, Pavia contends the NCAA’s approach to eligibility does not support the academic progression of junior college athletes, as intended. Instead, he asserts, starting an athlete’s eligibility clock at a two-year institution does not align with helping them reach academic or athletic goals once they join an NCAA institution. He advocates for adjustments to the bylaw, proposing that the eligibility clock should only start when an athlete enrolls at an NCAA institution.
Read more: Attorney Challenges NCAA’s $2.78 Billion Settlement in Landmark Antitrust Cases
In addition to eligibility concerns, Pavia’s suit highlights barriers to junior college athletes’ potential income from name, image, and likeness (NIL) deals. Since the Supreme Court’s 2021 ruling allowing college athletes to receive compensation for NIL, multiple lawsuits have scrutinized NCAA policies that plaintiffs claim restrict financial opportunities for athletes. According to Bloomberg, Pavia’s case joins a growing wave of litigation addressing college athletes’ economic rights.
This legal action follows recent developments involving NCAA athlete compensation. Last month, a federal judge granted preliminary approval for a $2.8 billion settlement in an antitrust case involving the NCAA. However, the settlement remains contentious, as some advocate for adjustments to ensure equitable pay across genders, Bloomberg reports.
Pavia, who previously played at a junior college before joining New Mexico State and later transferring to Vanderbilt, suggests changes that would redefine intercollegiate competition within NCAA bylaws. Under his proposal, eligibility would be based on enrollment at an NCAA member institution rather than any collegiate institution, which could give junior college athletes a fairer chance at completing a full four-season collegiate career.
Source: Bloomberg
Featured News
Google Urges FTC to Breakup of Microsoft’s Exclusive OpenAI Partnership: Report
Dec 10, 2024 by
CPI
Trump Announces Andrew Ferguson as FTC Chair Nominee Amid Antitrust Policy Uncertainty
Dec 10, 2024 by
CPI
Judge Halts Kroger-Albertsons Merger Over Antitrust Concerns
Dec 10, 2024 by
CPI
RealPage Clears DOJ Criminal Investigation, Faces Ongoing Civil Suits
Dec 10, 2024 by
CPI
Nvidia Responds to China’s Antitrust Probe, Vows Full Cooperation
Dec 10, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Moats & Entrenchment
Nov 29, 2024 by
CPI
Assessing the Potential for Antitrust Moats and Trenches in the Generative AI Industry
Nov 29, 2024 by
Allison Holt, Sushrut Jain & Ashley Zhou
How SEP Hold-up Can Lead to Entrenchment
Nov 29, 2024 by
Jay Jurata, Elena Kamenir & Christie Boyden
The Role of Moats in Unlocking Economic Growth
Nov 29, 2024 by
CPI
Overcoming Moats and Entrenchment: Disruptive Innovation in Generative AI May Be More Successful than Regulation
Nov 29, 2024 by
Simon Chisholm & Charlie Whitehead