Pete Levitas, Kelly Schoolmeester, Sep 11, 2014
On January 8, 2014, Judge Orrick of the Northern District of California found that a consummated merger between Bazaarvoice and PowerReviews violated Section 7 of the Clayton Act. The Department of Justice challenge to this transaction and the court’s ruling have been much analyzed, and for good reason — the case provides significant insights into how the agencies approach merger challenges, how courts view those challenges, and how effective the agencies may be in challenging mergers post-consummation.
Featured News
Why Prediction Markets Are Keeping Compliance Chiefs Up at Night
Apr 3, 2026 by
CPI
Gaps in the National Polic Framework on AI Leave State Regulations in Limbo, Report Claims
Apr 3, 2026 by
CPI
Federal Judge Narrows Yardi Antitrust Lawsuit, Dismisses Out-of-State Defendants
Apr 2, 2026 by
CPI
Italian Regulator Fines Revolut €11 Million Over Alleged Misleading Practices
Apr 2, 2026 by
CPI
Justice Department Challenges Decision Stopping Anthropic AI Ban
Apr 2, 2026 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Competitor Collaborations
Mar 26, 2026 by
CPI
Between Scylla and Charybdis – Navigating Transatlantic Antitrust Currents
Mar 26, 2026 by
Tilman Kuhn & Niklas Brüggemann
Cartel Enforcement Moves Into the Labor Market: Trends and Implications
Mar 26, 2026 by
Andreas Kafetzopoulos & Caroline Janssens
Rethinking Buy-Side Antitrust “Group Boycotts”
Mar 26, 2026 by
Craig Falls & Brendan McGuire
Positive Collaborations: The Tools Available to Competition Authorities to Encourage Beneficial Interactions Between Competitors
Mar 26, 2026 by
Rona Bar-Isaac & Thomas Withers