Pete Levitas, Kelly Schoolmeester, Sep 11, 2014
On January 8, 2014, Judge Orrick of the Northern District of California found that a consummated merger between Bazaarvoice and PowerReviews violated Section 7 of the Clayton Act. The Department of Justice challenge to this transaction and the court’s ruling have been much analyzed, and for good reason — the case provides significant insights into how the agencies approach merger challenges, how courts view those challenges, and how effective the agencies may be in challenging mergers post-consummation.
Links to Full Content
Featured News
French Prosecutors Open Investigation into X’s Algorithmic Bias
Feb 8, 2025 by
CPI
Meta Urges US Appeals Court to Uphold $725 Million Privacy Settlement
Feb 8, 2025 by
CPI
UnitedHealth Group Withdraws Motion to Dismiss Antitrust Challenge
Feb 8, 2025 by
CPI
Tech Firms Raise Alarm Over Ex-Amazon Exec Leading UK Competition Regulator
Feb 8, 2025 by
CPI
US Consumers File Lawsuit to Block Nippon Steel’s Acquisition of US Steel
Feb 8, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – International Criminal Enforcement
Jan 23, 2025 by
CPI
The Antitrust Division’s Recent Work to Combat International Cartels
Jan 23, 2025 by
Emma Burnham & Benjamin Christenson
Information Sharing: The New Frontier of U.S. Antitrust Enforcement
Jan 23, 2025 by
Brian P. Quinn, Casey Kovarik & Michael Tubach
The Key Role of Guidelines on Exchanges of Information Among Competitors and the Divergent Transatlantic Paths
Jan 23, 2025 by
Rosa Abrantes-Metz & Albert Metz
Leniency, Whistleblowers, and Compliance
Jan 23, 2025 by
Richard Powers, Tara O’Malley & Cory Gordon