Amer Sports Inc., the main agent in Japan for tennis rackets made by US company Wilson Sporting Goods, is said to be working with the Fair Trade Commission to avoid being charged with violating antitrust laws.
Amer Sports Inc. has submitted a plan to the country’s watchdog to demonstrate that it has stopped blocking efforts by other retailers to import the equipment from overseas sellers and thereby level the playing field in Japan.
JFTC investigators searched the offices of Amer Sports Japan Inc. in September 2020 over suspicions the company actively prevented retailers from importing Wilson Sporting equipment.
As well as Wilson tennis rackets, the company handles products made by French sports equipment manufacturer Salomon and high performance outdoor equipment maker Arc’teryx, according to sources.
Amer Sports Japan allegedly applied pressure on foreign sellers so they did not sell Wilson tennis rackets to Japanese companies seeking to import the equipment through other channels.
Some companies are still facing difficulties handling Wilson products even after the JFTC began its investigation of Amer Sports Japan, according to sources in the sporting goods sector.
An Amer Sports Japan representative said the company was continuing to deal with the investigation by the JFTC but declined further comment.
Interfering with efforts by other importers to purchase products is considered a violation of the Anti-Monopoly Law.
The JFTC will end its investigation of violations by the company if it determines that Amer Sports Japan is keeping to its side of the bargain in terms of the plan it submitted and that the competitive environment for Wilson rackets has improved, sources said.
Read More: Competition Law and Sports in Japan: A New Olympic Legacy?
Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.
Featured News
Synopsys Secures EU Approval for $35 Billion Ansys Acquisition
Jan 13, 2025 by
CPI
New UK Legislation to Combat Ticket Resale and Algorithmic Price-Fixing
Jan 12, 2025 by
CPI
Supreme Court Justices Grill TikTok’s Lawyer in National Security Case
Jan 12, 2025 by
CPI
FTC, DOJ Weigh Antitrust Issues in Musk’s OpenAI Case
Jan 12, 2025 by
CPI
UK Trial Begins as Apple Defends App Store Fees in £1.5 Billion Case
Jan 12, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand