Chinese smartphone giant Xiaomi has requested India’s antitrust regulator, the Competition Commission of India (CCI), to withdraw a report that alleges both Xiaomi and Walmart-owned Flipkart violated competition laws. According to Reuters, the company argues that the report contains sensitive commercial data that should have been redacted before being shared with the parties involved in the case.
Xiaomi’s appeal could potentially delay the ongoing antitrust investigation, which was initiated in 2021. Per Finance Yahoo, this request mirrors a similar action in August, where the CCI withdrew a report on Apple after the U.S. tech company raised concerns about the inclusion of confidential business information in its investigation documents.
In its application, Xiaomi stated that the CCI’s investigation report on Flipkart includes sensitive business data, specifically detailing the company’s model-wise sales figures. Such data, Xiaomi argues, is critical to its competitive positioning in the Indian market and should not have been disclosed without appropriate redaction, two sources familiar with the matter told Reuters.
Both Xiaomi and Flipkart have not yet commented on the matter, nor has the CCI responded to Reuters’ inquiries. While the CCI does not make these reports publicly available, they are shared with the parties involved in the case. If the watchdog decides to recall the report, the parties would be required to return the document, which would then undergo further review to ensure that any confidential information is properly redacted before it is reissued.
Related: Samsung, Xiaomi Among Smartphone Brands Allegedly Involved in eCommerce Collusion In India
The investigation centers around allegations that major e-commerce platforms, including Flipkart and Amazon, prioritized certain sellers and listings, giving them unfair advantages. The watchdog also found evidence of collaboration between these platforms and smartphone manufacturers like Xiaomi to launch exclusive products on their websites, as reported by Reuters earlier this month.
Xiaomi’s concerns are specific to the data related to Flipkart. Per Finance Yahoo, the company is not contesting a separate report on Amazon, which also implicates Xiaomi in exclusive product deals that may have breached competition laws. However, sources revealed that Xiaomi is pushing for the CCI to demand the return of all copies of the report to ensure that the sensitive information is properly redacted and not misused.
This is not the first time the CCI has encountered such issues. In a previous case involving Apple, the commission recalled an investigation report after the company complained that it contained confidential commercial information. The CCI’s report on Apple concluded that the tech giant had abused its dominant market position concerning its iOS app store. Apple has denied any wrongdoing.
India’s smartphone market is highly competitive, with Xiaomi and South Korea’s Samsung controlling nearly 36% of the market, according to Counterpoint Research. Other major players include Vivo, Realme, and Motorola, all of which have also been implicated in the CCI’s investigation into exclusive product launches on Flipkart. The commission has criticized these practices, labeling them as anti-competitive and detrimental to consumer interests.
Source: Finance Yahoo
Featured News
Judge Dismisses Antitrust Lawsuit Against Ivy League Over Athletic Scholarships
Oct 11, 2024 by
CPI
FTC and DOJ Revamp Merger Guidelines to Identify Illegal Transactions More Efficiently
Oct 11, 2024 by
CPI
US Consumer Watchdog Eyes Expansion of ‘Junk Fee’ Crackdown Ahead of 2024 Election
Oct 10, 2024 by
CPI
Brazil Proposes Reform to Competition Law Targeting Big Tech
Oct 10, 2024 by
CPI
Meta Enhances User Data Control, Resolving German Antitrust Dispute
Oct 10, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Refusal to Deal
Sep 27, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust’s Refusal-to-Deal Doctrine: The Emperor Has No Clothes
Sep 27, 2024 by
Erik Hovenkamp
Why All Antitrust Claims are Refusal to Deal Claims and What that Means for Policy
Sep 27, 2024 by
Ramsi Woodcock
The Aspen Misadventure
Sep 27, 2024 by
Roger Blair & Holly P. Stidham
Refusal to Deal in Antitrust Law: Evolving Jurisprudence and Business Justifications in the Align Technology Case
Sep 27, 2024 by
Timothy Hsieh