Michael Hammock, Paul Rubin, May 20, 2011
The debate over online privacy pays too little attention to the costs and benefits of the current systems of privacy protection and advertising-supported online applications. The costs of online privacy-related harm (such as identity theft) and of protective activities are small relative to the benefits from applications that are supported by online advertising, which depends on the collection of personal information. Advocates of increased privacy focus too much on increased privacy as a solution, and not enough on alternative forms of information security. Surveys show that consumers do not like targeted advertising, or the information collection that allows it, but this may be a form of rational irrationality.That is, it may not pay for consumers to understand the costs and benefits of reduced information use.
Featured News
Frozen-Potato Producers Must Face Most Price-Fixing Claims, Judge Rules
Sep 21, 2026 by
CPI
Paramount Reaches Deal With States, Clearing Major Hurdle to Warner Bros. Takeover
Sep 21, 2026 by
CPI
Russia Opens Antitrust Cases Over Generic Versions of Pfizer’s Eliquis
Sep 21, 2026 by
CPI
Google Faces €403 Million EU Privacy Penalty Over Location Tracking
Sep 21, 2026 by
CPI
Korea Antitrust Regulator Weighs Tougher Inspection Rules After Coupang Court Challenge
Sep 21, 2026 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Computational Antitrust
Sep 16, 2026 by
CPI
The Next Five Years of Computational Antitrust
Sep 16, 2026 by
Thibault Schrepel
When Two AI Agents Talk: A Gap in Detection Capabilities
Sep 16, 2026 by
Alba Ribera Martinez
When Innovation Competition Has No Product Yet: Making General Innovation Competition Operational
Sep 16, 2026 by
Mariateresa Maggiolino
Computational Antitrust for Complex Adaptive Markets
Sep 16, 2026 by
Filip Lubinski