A PYMNTS Company

Chile: Competition tribunal rejects suit against Claro and Movistar

By  |  September 20, 2016
Chile: Competition tribunal rejects suit against Claro and Movistar

Chile’s Tribunal for the Defense of Free Competition (TDLC) has rejected the lawsuit presented by the National Corporation for Consumers and Users (CONADECUS) against mobile operators Movistar, CLaro and Entel. The suit, presented in 2014 by the consumer protection group, had accused the companies of conspiring against free competition.

    Get the Full Story

    Complete the form to unlock this article and enjoy unlimited free access to all PYMNTS content — no additional logins required.

    yesSubscribe to our daily newsletter, PYMNTS Today.

    By completing this form, you agree to receive marketing communications from PYMNTS and to the sharing of your information with our sponsor, if applicable, in accordance with our Privacy Policy and Terms and Conditions.

    CONADECUS held that the firms, which took part in a public contest for frequencies in the 700MHz range, had “exceeded the limits to the permitted range of spectrum that can be legally held by an operator which competes within Chile’s telecommunications market, thus hoarding this resource and placing its effective and efficient use at risk, as well as disturbing the necessary homogeneity in its distribution.”

    The TDLC’s resolution has described these actions as “attempts to block or delay the arrival of new competitors”. However, the TDLC has rejected the lawsuit, considering that the CONADECUS had failed to offer clear and conclusive evidence of this accusation.

    Full Content: Economía y Negocios

    Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.