Corinne Chew, R. Ian McEwin, Nov 05, 2010
The Baidu case, one of the first abuse of dominance cases in China, is important in several respects. First, it was one of the first private competition law actions in China. Second, the judgment was read out in a real-time broadcast. Third, the legal reasoning was more detailed than in other competition law cases. Fourth, the Court stressed the importance of economic reasoning and evidence in deciding such cases. This paper analyzes both the facts of the case and its significance.
Featured News
Romania Fines Seed and Crop-Protection Firms $18 Million in Price-Fixing Case
Aug 13, 2026 by
CPI
Glenmark to Pay $15.3 Million to Settle Humana Antitrust Claims
Aug 13, 2026 by
CPI
Pacific Seafood Faces $789 Million Claim in Crab Price-Fixing Antitrust Case
Aug 13, 2026 by
CPI
Apple Hires American Airlines Veteran to Lead Government Affairs
Aug 12, 2026 by
CPI
PayPal Defeats Antitrust Challenge to Merchant Payment Rules
Aug 12, 2026 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Antitrust Compliance
Jul 20, 2026 by
CPI
Your Antitrust Compliance Program: A Strong Voice in Your Defense
Jul 20, 2026 by
Joe Murphy
Antitrust Compliance for the AI Pricing Era
Jul 20, 2026 by
Alejandra Uria & Andre Geverola
Race to Report: Antitrust Leniency in the Whistleblower Era
Jul 20, 2026 by
Brian R. Faerstein & Nicole H. Sprinzen
Antitrust-By-Design: Competition Compliance in Digital Markets
Jul 20, 2026 by
Marcos Drummond Malvar, Gabriela Costa Carvalho Forsman & Luciana Mendes