Keith Hylton, Sep 01, 2005
Perhaps no area of antitrust law provokes as much controversy as predatory pricing, the theory that a firm violates the antitrust laws by setting its price too low. Under the standard definition, predatory pricing involves a strategy of cutting price below the level at which a competitor can survive in the market and then raising price to the monopoly level in a later stage known as recoupment period.
Featured News
Fifth Circuit Orders Google Antitrust Case Moved to California
Apr 7, 2026 by
CPI
Federal Appeals Court Sides With CFTC on Jurisdiction Over Prediction Markets
Apr 7, 2026 by
CPI
Wilson Sonsini Bolsters Hong Kong Office With New Antitrust Partner
Apr 7, 2026 by
CPI
IMF Highlights Risks From Tokenized Finance and Stablecoins in New Report
Apr 7, 2026 by
CPI
Senators Propose Bill to End Tax Breaks for Large Corporate Mergers
Apr 7, 2026 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Competitor Collaborations
Mar 26, 2026 by
CPI
Between Scylla and Charybdis – Navigating Transatlantic Antitrust Currents
Mar 26, 2026 by
Tilman Kuhn & Niklas Brüggemann
Cartel Enforcement Moves Into the Labor Market: Trends and Implications
Mar 26, 2026 by
Andreas Kafetzopoulos & Caroline Janssens
Rethinking Buy-Side Antitrust “Group Boycotts”
Mar 26, 2026 by
Craig Falls & Brendan McGuire
Positive Collaborations: The Tools Available to Competition Authorities to Encourage Beneficial Interactions Between Competitors
Mar 26, 2026 by
Rona Bar-Isaac & Thomas Withers