Identifying, Challenging, and Assigning Political Responsibility for State Regulation Restricting Competition
Maureen Ohlhausen, Nov 01, 2006
This paper examines the role of competition advocacy in combating anticompetitive state regulation. Looking at the constraints facing competition officials such as the state action doctrine, the analysis suggests potential avenues for surmounting these constraints. Relying on experience as the Director of the U.S. Federal Trade Commission’s Office of Policy Planning, the author uses real-world examples—real estate brokerage and interstate direct shipment of wine—to demonstrate the ability of a competition agency to use a variety of techniques to improve consumer welfare when enforcement is circumscribed due to state activity.
Featured News
States, Environmental Groups Oppose EPA Power-Plant Emissions Repeal
Oct 1, 2026 by
CPI
US Judge Dismisses Publisher Antitrust Cases Against Google Over AI Search
Oct 1, 2026 by
CPI
Mexico Antitrust Regulator Said to Clear $450 Million Telefónica Sale
Oct 1, 2026 by
CPI
Transocean’s $5.8 Billion Valaris Deal Clears U.S. Antitrust Review
Oct 1, 2026 by
CPI
Binance Faces EU Scrutiny Over Crypto Services Without MiCA License
Oct 1, 2026 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – National Security
Sep 22, 2026 by
CPI
National Security in U.S. Antitrust Enforcement: Toward a More Disciplined Framework
Sep 22, 2026 by
Rod Rosenstein & Timothy Finley
The Department of War’s M&A Review Guidance: What Companies in the Defense Industry Need to Know
Sep 22, 2026 by
Eric Stocking & Paul Ney
National Security, Resilience and the Boundaries of Merger Control
Sep 22, 2026 by
Beatriz Marques
National Security and Competition: Building Resilient Telecommunications Networks
Sep 22, 2026 by
Roslyn Layton