Michael Salinger, Apr 01, 2006
With a major set of hearings scheduled in the United States on the antitrust treatment of single-firm conduct, economists have an opportunity to provide analysis that informs policy. Yet, the opportunity will be lost if economic analysis does not provide insights into how to distinguish anticompetitive from pro-competitive behavior. The authors argue that the economics literature on one type of single-firm conduct”tying”has been less influential than it should have been, and examine whether there are lessons to be learned from that failure. The authors argue that the two principal causes are 1) the almost complete neglect of competitive tying (while focusing heavily on anticompetitive tying) and 2) an excessive reliance on theory alone.
Featured News
States, Environmental Groups Oppose EPA Power-Plant Emissions Repeal
Oct 1, 2026 by
CPI
US Judge Dismisses Publisher Antitrust Cases Against Google Over AI Search
Oct 1, 2026 by
CPI
Mexico Antitrust Regulator Said to Clear $450 Million Telefónica Sale
Oct 1, 2026 by
CPI
Transocean’s $5.8 Billion Valaris Deal Clears U.S. Antitrust Review
Oct 1, 2026 by
CPI
Binance Faces EU Scrutiny Over Crypto Services Without MiCA License
Oct 1, 2026 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – National Security
Sep 22, 2026 by
CPI
National Security in U.S. Antitrust Enforcement: Toward a More Disciplined Framework
Sep 22, 2026 by
Rod Rosenstein & Timothy Finley
The Department of War’s M&A Review Guidance: What Companies in the Defense Industry Need to Know
Sep 22, 2026 by
Eric Stocking & Paul Ney
National Security, Resilience and the Boundaries of Merger Control
Sep 22, 2026 by
Beatriz Marques
National Security and Competition: Building Resilient Telecommunications Networks
Sep 22, 2026 by
Roslyn Layton