Glen Weyl, Alexander White, Jan 30, 2015
Many of the leading controversies in competition policy in the last two decades, especially those surrounding the Microsoft case, reflect the challenges posed by platform industries. Unfortunately, too often economists and policymakers have drawn the wrong lessons when thinking about such industries. Central to our analysis is a more realistic view of the process of consumer coordination. Platforms often use “usage revenue later” strategies to ensure that consumers coordinate on their platform. This greatly mitigates the possibility of inefficient lock-in or excessive dominance by a leading platform, but it makes inefficient fragmentation a greater danger. Thus regulation, rather than competition policy, may be more appropriate in addressing potential market failures arising in platform industries.
Featured News
States, Environmental Groups Oppose EPA Power-Plant Emissions Repeal
Oct 1, 2026 by
CPI
US Judge Dismisses Publisher Antitrust Cases Against Google Over AI Search
Oct 1, 2026 by
CPI
Mexico Antitrust Regulator Said to Clear $450 Million Telefónica Sale
Oct 1, 2026 by
CPI
Transocean’s $5.8 Billion Valaris Deal Clears U.S. Antitrust Review
Oct 1, 2026 by
CPI
Binance Faces EU Scrutiny Over Crypto Services Without MiCA License
Oct 1, 2026 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – National Security
Sep 22, 2026 by
CPI
National Security in U.S. Antitrust Enforcement: Toward a More Disciplined Framework
Sep 22, 2026 by
Rod Rosenstein & Timothy Finley
The Department of War’s M&A Review Guidance: What Companies in the Defense Industry Need to Know
Sep 22, 2026 by
Eric Stocking & Paul Ney
National Security, Resilience and the Boundaries of Merger Control
Sep 22, 2026 by
Beatriz Marques
National Security and Competition: Building Resilient Telecommunications Networks
Sep 22, 2026 by
Roslyn Layton