David Evans, May 20, 2011
This article examines antitrust analysis when one of the possible subject products of an antitrust or merger is ordinarily offered at a zero price. It shows that businesses often offer a product for free because it increases the overall profits they can earn from selling the free product and a companion product to either the same customer or different customers. The companion product may be a complement, a premium version of the free product, or the product on the other side of a two-sided market. The article then shows how antitrust and merger analysis should proceed when the subject is either the free product or the companion product. A key point is that the existence of a free good signals that there is a companion good, that firms consider both products simultaneously in maximizing profit, and that commonly used methods of antitrust analysis, including market definition, probably need to be adjusted to properly analyze two inextricably linked products. When antitrust or merger analysis involves a free product, the analysis of consumer welfare and injury also needs to account for customers of both the free product and its companion product since any change in market conditions for customers of one product affects the customers of the other product. Much of the analysis of the article is also relevant to other common situations in which price is set less than marginal cost.
Featured News
Butterball Moves to End Turkey Antitrust Litigation With $34M Pact
Aug 23, 2026 by
CPI
Uber’s California Racketeering Case Against Lawyers, Doctors Moves Forward
Aug 23, 2026 by
CPI
Epic Challenges Apple’s Compliance With Brazil App Store Antitrust Settlement
Aug 23, 2026 by
CPI
EU Ends Pratt & Whitney Canada Antitrust Probe After Contract Changes
Aug 23, 2026 by
CPI
Paramount, California to Meet Monday on Antitrust Settlement
Aug 23, 2026 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Antitrust Antipasto
Aug 24, 2026 by
CPI
“Anti-Monopoly” Antitrust Enforcement: Lessons Learned from the Biden Administration
Aug 24, 2026 by
Diana L. Moss
FTC v. Meta: The Importance of Quantitative Evidence in Antitrust
Aug 24, 2026 by
Dennis Carlton, John A. List, Allan Shampine, Hal Sider & Theresa Sullivan
Competitor Information Exchanges: Reducing Market Uncertainty Is What Matters, Not Level Of Detail
Aug 24, 2026 by
Kasia Czapracka, Assimakis Komninos, James Killick & Nina Frie
When Politics Meets Merger Control: 10 Transatlantic Takeaways
Aug 24, 2026 by
Rachel Brandenburger