Herbert Hovenkamp, Apr 01, 2006
The success of the Areeda-Turner test for predatory pricing and the U.S. Supreme Court’s adoption of demanding proof requirements in its 1993 Brooke Group decision have made it very difficult for plaintiffs to win conventional predatory pricing claims. While many challenges to exclusionary pricing continue to be made, the legal theory has evolved away from classical predation to a variety of other theories. This paper examines the state of the law of both conventional predatory pricing and these recent variants and offers some recommendations.
Featured News
ICE’s $6 Billion MarketAxess Takeover Advances After US Antitrust Clearance
Oct 25, 2026 by
CPI
McCormick’s $44.8 Billion Unilever Food Deal Clears Key US Antitrust Hurdle
Oct 25, 2026 by
CPI
EU Launches Antitrust Probe Into Key Paper-Making Material
Oct 25, 2026 by
CPI
UK Seeks Exemption From EU Technology Rules as Trade Tensions Grow
Oct 25, 2026 by
CPI
Live Nation Reveals Trump Attended White House Antitrust Settlement Meeting
Oct 25, 2026 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – EU Merger Guidelines
Oct 19, 2026 by
CPI
In Praise of Theories of Benefits
Oct 19, 2026 by
Cyril Hariton & Pierre Regibeau
Closing the Efficiencies Gap
Oct 19, 2026 by
Kasia Czapracka & Marika Harjula
Analysis of Dynamic Trade-Offs Under the New Guidelines: Would Cases Like Amazon/Irobot Turn Out Differently?
Oct 19, 2026 by
Oliver Latham, Sam Marden, Saul Mendelsohn & Serge Moresi
Exploitative Portfolio Effects In EU Merger Control: From Mars/Kellanova to the Draft Merger Guidelines
Oct 19, 2026 by
Niels Baeten, Danette Chan & Elizabeth Malik