Underpricing
Barry Nalebuff, Apr 01, 2005 The takeaway point of Tirole’s excellent primer is that tying, while potentially exclusionary, does not deserve special treatment. This commentary offers two reasons why tying should be accorded special treatment. First, unlike predatory pricing, tying offers a monopolist the ability to engage in no-cost predation. A critical component of the […]
Featured News
EU Moves to Give Dominant Companies More Flexibility Under Antitrust Rules
Sep 3, 2026 by
CPI
US Shale Producers Must Face Oil Price-Fixing Claims, Judge Rules
Sep 3, 2026 by
CPI
Nvidia to Buy Hugging Face for $12.9 Billion in Open-AI Push
Sep 3, 2026 by
CPI
Apple Tracking Curbs Come Under Fire in $2.7 Billion UK Case
Sep 3, 2026 by
CPI
Veterinary Accreditor Defeats Antitrust Challenge From Tennessee University
Sep 3, 2026 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix
Antitrust Chronicle® – State Attorneys General
Aug 27, 2026 by
CPI
CPI Talks… with Jonathan Skrmetti, Attorney General of Tennessee
Aug 27, 2026 by
Jonathan Skrmetti
What the Live Nation Jury Instructions Tell Us About California’s Unfair Competition Law
Aug 27, 2026 by
Henry Hauser, Brent Nakamura, Ashley Kaplan, Brian Wang & Cari Jeffries
From Backroom Deals to Public Scrutiny: The Tunney Act’s Past, Present, and Future
Aug 27, 2026 by
Christina M. Black & Ashley A. Locke
Understanding the Fragility of Economic Concentration Through the Principles of Ecology
Aug 27, 2026 by
Alexandra Spring