By: Joseph Farrell (Network Law Review)
Competition policy is founded on a basic principle: in competitive markets, better deals attract more business, which creates a safeguard against the incompetence or greed of any one player. This incentivizes businesses to operate efficiently, price competitively, and innovate to stay ahead.
Despite this simplicity, antitrust law can be complex. Is this complexity necessary, or should we strive for a more straightforward approach to the core principle? In this discussion, we will consider some simplified analyses to better understand these profound questions. While relying on more evidence and nuanced analysis has its clear benefits, we should also explore the potential advantages of a more streamlined approach…
Featured News
Judge Mehta Questions Both Sides in Landmark Google Antitrust Case
May 2, 2024 by
CPI
FCC Urges Urgent Funding for Removal of Chinese Telecom Equipment from U.S. Networks
May 2, 2024 by
CPI
Former Pioneer CEO Facing Potential Criminal Charges For Colluding With OPEC
May 2, 2024 by
CPI
South Korea’s Antitrust Regulator Greenlights K-Pop Powerhouse Deal
May 2, 2024 by
CPI
Exxon’s Pioneer Purchase Approved, Former CEO Barred from Board
May 2, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Economics of Criminal Antitrust
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
Navigating Economic Expert Work in Criminal Antitrust Litigation
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
The Increased Importance of Economics in Cartel Cases
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
A Law and Economics Analysis of the Antitrust Treatment of Physician Collective Price Agreements
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
Information Exchange In Criminal Antitrust Cases: How Economic Testimony Can Tip The Scales
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI