By: Steven Salop (ProMarket)
The consumer welfare standard, the guiding principle for Antitrust practice and enforcement for much of recent history, may be coming to an end. Ideas for replacing the existing “consumer” label with a more inclusive or general term, such as “trading partner” welfare, include considering standards such as competitive process protection, effective competition, protecting competition, inclusive growth, anti-monopoly, and freedom from domination.
As for author Steven Salop, his own choice is the “Reasonable Competitive Conduct” (“RCC”) standard, which is a hyprid sharing some of the basic concerns and features of other standards mentioned above, including a recognition of the importance of trading partner welfare, while making an effort to maintain the language and spirit of the Sherman, Clayton, and FTC Acts.
In this short article, the author focuses the standard more narrowly, to describe what might be referred to as “vertical coercion”, and addressing two separate, and sometimes conflicting, concerns…
Featured News
Uruguayan Antitrust Scrutiny Puts Major Meatpacking Deal Between Marfrig and Minerva on Hold
May 19, 2024 by
CPI
Alaska Airlines Seeks Dismissal of Consumer Lawsuit Over $1.9 Billion Hawaiian Airlines Buy
May 19, 2024 by
CPI
Idaho Attorney General Orders Split of Kootenai Health and Syringa Hospital
May 19, 2024 by
CPI
Court Rejects T-Mobile’s Appeal Bid in Antitrust Case Over Sprint Merger
May 19, 2024 by
CPI
Google Requests Judge, Not Jury, to Decide on Antitrust Case
May 19, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Ecosystems
May 9, 2024 by
CPI
Mapping Antitrust onto Digital Ecosystems
May 9, 2024 by
CPI
Ecosystems and Competition Law: A Law and Political Economy Approach
May 9, 2024 by
CPI
Ecosystem Theories of Harm: What is Beyond the Buzzword?
May 9, 2024 by
CPI
Open Ecosystems: Benefits, Challenges, and Implications for Antitrust
May 9, 2024 by
CPI