This article examines some of the ways in which the states have contributed to important developments in the antitrust laws, both historically and in the present. Although they are resource constrained, the states have made a significant impact on the overall direction of the antitrust laws, by bringing a consumer-centric analysis to anticompetitive conduct and legislation. While the states often work cooperatively with the federal enforcers, there are many examples throughout history, and recently, where states have acted independent of the federal agencies. The article concludes that concurrent jurisdiction of the antitrust laws is beneficial and produces the best outcomes for consumers.
Featured News
DOJ Prosecutors Advise Against Criminal Charges in Live Nation Antitrust Probe
Dec 17, 2025 by
CPI
Supreme Court Closes Door on REX Antitrust Case Against Realtors Group
Dec 17, 2025 by
CPI
PepsiCo and Walmart Face Federal Lawsuit Alleging Long-Running Price-Fixing Scheme
Dec 17, 2025 by
CPI
Utah Reaches Antitrust Settlement With Sandoz Over Generic Drug Pricing
Dec 17, 2025 by
CPI
China Regulator Flags ‘Lowest-Price’ Demands as Potential Antitrust Violations
Dec 17, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 16, 2025 by
CPI
Learning from Divergence: The Role of Cross-Country Comparisons in the Evaluation of the DMA
Dec 16, 2025 by
Federico Bruni
New Regulatory Tools for the EU Foreign Direct Investment Screening and Foreign Subsidies Regulation
Dec 16, 2025 by
Ioannis Kokkoris
“Suite Dreams”: Market Definition and Complementarity in the Digital Age
Dec 16, 2025 by
Romain Bizet & Matteo Foschi
The Interaction Between Competition Policy and Consumer Protection: Institutional Design, Behavioral Insights, and Emerging Challenges in Digital Markets
Dec 16, 2025 by
Alessandra Tonazzi