This article examines some of the ways in which the states have contributed to important developments in the antitrust laws, both historically and in the present. Although they are resource constrained, the states have made a significant impact on the overall direction of the antitrust laws, by bringing a consumer-centric analysis to anticompetitive conduct and legislation. While the states often work cooperatively with the federal enforcers, there are many examples throughout history, and recently, where states have acted independent of the federal agencies. The article concludes that concurrent jurisdiction of the antitrust laws is beneficial and produces the best outcomes for consumers.
Featured News
Realtors Group to Pay $52 Million to Settle Homebuyer Antitrust Claims
Apr 10, 2026 by
CPI
Delaware Wants to be the Regulatory Home for Stablecoins
Apr 10, 2026 by
CPI
Bessent, Powell Summon Bank CEOs Over Anthropic’s New AI Model
Apr 10, 2026 by
CPI
Florida Attorney General Launches Investigation Into OpenAI and ChatGPT
Apr 9, 2026 by
CPI
Chainalysis Sees Stablecoins Becoming Core Global Payment Infrastructure
Apr 9, 2026 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Competitor Collaborations
Mar 26, 2026 by
CPI
Between Scylla and Charybdis – Navigating Transatlantic Antitrust Currents
Mar 26, 2026 by
Tilman Kuhn & Niklas Brüggemann
Cartel Enforcement Moves Into the Labor Market: Trends and Implications
Mar 26, 2026 by
Andreas Kafetzopoulos & Caroline Janssens
Rethinking Buy-Side Antitrust “Group Boycotts”
Mar 26, 2026 by
Craig Falls & Brendan McGuire
Positive Collaborations: The Tools Available to Competition Authorities to Encourage Beneficial Interactions Between Competitors
Mar 26, 2026 by
Rona Bar-Isaac & Thomas Withers