Qualcomm and Apple’s US$1 billion battle has ended in a mixed ruling, with a US judge granting Qualcomm’s motion to dismiss, but granted Apple’s motion to dismiss counterclaims of unfair competition.
In January, Apple sued Qualcomm in the US District Court for the Southern District of California for unfairly insisting on charging royalties for “technologies they have nothing to do with”.
The smartphone maker sought a declaration of non-infringement or invalidity, or that the court set a fair, reasonable and non-discriminatory royalty on nine Qualcomm patents.
Apple claimed that the more it innovated with new features, the more money Qualcomm collects for “no reason” and the “more expensive it becomes for Apple to fund these innovations”.
According to Apple, Qualcomm has withheld nearly US$1 billion in payments from Apple as retaliation for “responding truthfully to law enforcement agencies investigating them”, alluding to antitrust investigations that have cost Qualcomm billions of dollars.
But Judge Gonzalo Curiel said that the absence of “detailed infringement analysis” as to the nine patents weighed severely against a declaratory judgement.
In the ruling, Curiel explained, “The court will ‘decline to invest judicial time and resources in a declaratory action’ that requests only piecemeal relief that does not resolve the disputes between the party in a worthwhile way.”
Full Content: Law 360
Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.
Featured News
Lawmaker Probes FTC and EU’s Role in Amazon’s Failed iRobot Acquisition
May 2, 2024 by
CPI
FTC to Approve Exxon’s $64 Billion Deal with Pioneer Resources, Excludes
May 1, 2024 by
CPI
UK Competition Watchdog Raises Alarm Over Nvidia’s ARM Takeover
May 1, 2024 by
CPI
Sen. Klobuchar Urges Regulators to Probe Collusion in Healthcare Pricing
May 1, 2024 by
CPI
Multiple States Join Tennessee’s Antitrust Lawsuit Against NCAA Over NIL Rules
May 1, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Economics of Criminal Antitrust
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
Navigating Economic Expert Work in Criminal Antitrust Litigation
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
The Increased Importance of Economics in Cartel Cases
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
A Law and Economics Analysis of the Antitrust Treatment of Physician Collective Price Agreements
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
Information Exchange In Criminal Antitrust Cases: How Economic Testimony Can Tip The Scales
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI