A PYMNTS Company

US: Supreme Court makes it much harder for patent trolls

By  |  May 23, 2017

The US Supreme Court handed down a ruling Monday that’s going to make life much harder for so-called “patent trolls” and will have significant implications for patent-rich Silicon Valley companies.

    Get the Full Story

    Complete the form to unlock this article and enjoy unlimited free access to all PYMNTS content — no additional logins required.

    yesSubscribe to our daily newsletter, PYMNTS Today.

    By completing this form, you agree to receive marketing communications from PYMNTS and to the sharing of your information with our sponsor, if applicable, in accordance with our Privacy Policy and Terms and Conditions.

    In a unanimous decision in the case TC Heartland v. Kraft Food Group Brands, the high court overturned a longstanding precedent that gave plaintiffs in patent cases latitude over where they filed their cases. Now patent suits can only be filed in courts located in the jurisdiction where the defendant company is incorporated.

    We’d love to be your preferred source for news.

    Please add us to your preferred sources list so our news, data and interviews show up in your feed. Thanks!

    Add as Preferred Source

    Patent assertion entities, more commonly known as patent trolls, get nearly all their revenue from buying patent licenses and then suing other companies for infringement and damages. More times than not, they file their suits in the Eastern District of Texas. In fact, more than 35 percent of all patent lawsuits in the US are filed in the Texas district, known for large awards to patent plaintiffs.

    Trolls will no longer be able to shop around for a sympathetic venue, which is good news for common patent suit targets like Apple and Alphabet’s Google.

    Full Content: Supreme Court

    Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.