Benjamin Edelman, March 20, 2016
Transportation Network Companies offer notable service advances—but do they comply with the law? I offer evidence of some important shortfalls, then consider how the legal system might appropriately respond. Though it is tempting to forgive many violations in light of the companies’ benefits, I offer a cautionary assessment. For one, I note the incentives that might result, including a race-to-the-bottom as a series of companies forego all manner of requirements. Furthermore, the firms that best compete in such an environment are likely to be those that build a corporate culture of ignoring laws, a diagnosis that finds support in numerous controversial Uber practices. On the whole, I suggest evenhanded enforcement of applicable laws, with thoughtful changes implemented with appropriate formality, but no automatic free pass for the platforms that have recently framed laws and regulations as suggestions rather than requirements.
Featured News
Germany Targets Fuel Price Spikes With New Daily Cap on Increases
Mar 17, 2026 by
CPI
Visa and Mastercard Win Right to Appeal UK Ruling on Interchange Fees
Mar 17, 2026 by
CPI
Spain’s Antitrust and Energy Watchdog to Release Blackout Report Without Blame
Mar 17, 2026 by
CPI
White House, GOP Again Trying to Enact Federal Preemption of State AI Laws
Mar 17, 2026 by
CPI
Klobuchar Unveils Bill to Strengthen Court Oversight of Antitrust Settlements
Mar 17, 2026 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Behavioral Economics
Feb 22, 2026 by
CPI
Behavioral Antitrust in 2026
Feb 22, 2026 by
Maurice Stucke
Behavioral Economics in Competition Policy: Going Beyond Inertia and Framing Effects
Feb 22, 2026 by
Annemieke Tuinstra & Richard May
Agreeing to Disagree in Antitrust
Feb 22, 2026 by
Jorge Padilla
Recognizing What’s Around the Corner: Merger Control, Capabilities, and the New Nature of Potential Competition
Feb 22, 2026 by
Magdalena Kuyterink & David J. Teece