The Role of Consumer Sovereignty in the Digital Information Age: The Intersection of Copyright, Communications and Antitrust Law
Posted by Social Science Research Network
The Role of Consumer Sovereignty in the Digital Information Age: The Intersection of Copyright, Communications and Antitrust Law – Mark Cooper (Fordham University)
ABSTRACT: In the digital age, the information sector resides at the intersection of three important areas of law, copyright, communications and antitrust. A recent analysis from the National Research Council entitled Copyright In the Digital Era: Building Evidence For Policy recognizes that the private incentive that copyright is intended to afford to creators and artists must be balanced by broad public interest benefits, identifying three areas of concern that correspond to these three areas of law.
• Copyright: Creativity – innovation and fair use to reflect the principle that copyrighted materials should be available not only for personal use, but as the building blocks on which creativity rests.
• Communications: Efficiency – optimal economics, network effects, transaction costs, technological change.
• Antitrust: Control of market power – consumer surplus, artist income, supra-competitive profits.
The NRC concluded that the knowledge base for policymaking in the copyright area is “poorly informed by objective data and empirical research” but that has not stopped the flood of court cases (and bills introduced in congress) to “fix” the problems that cut across all three areas of law.
This paper reviews the arguments and outcomes in a number of prominent cases,some of which fall into several areas of the law, to develop key themes
Communications Act
Open Internet Order
Comcast-NBC,
Cabelvision v. Viacom
ABC v. Aereo
Fox v. Dish
Copyright/Patent
Grokster
Kirstaeng
Pandora v. ASCAP, BMI
Alice Bank
ABC v. Aereo
Fox v. Dish
Antitrust
Comcast-NBC,
E-book Price Fixing
Pandora v. ASCAP, BMI
Cabelvision v. Viacom
The paper argues that a dramatic increase in consumer sovereignty is the key to the effectiveness of the digital revolution in generating benefits for the public. Evidence on usage patterns is provided to demonstrate dramatic changes, changes that threaten dominant incumbents (music labels and publishers, book publishers, broadcast networks).
Second, while it is frequently asserted that old law is standing in the way of new technology, these cases demonstrate that traditional principles that have withstood the test of time remain vitally important to promote competition, innovation, economic growth and public welfare.
The value of three principles is described in terms of the court materials — access in communications, balance in copyright, and fair competition in antitrust.
Featured News
Uruguayan Antitrust Scrutiny Puts Major Meatpacking Deal Between Marfrig and Minerva on Hold
May 19, 2024 by
CPI
Alaska Airlines Seeks Dismissal of Consumer Lawsuit Over $1.9 Billion Hawaiian Airlines Buy
May 19, 2024 by
CPI
Idaho Attorney General Orders Split of Kootenai Health and Syringa Hospital
May 19, 2024 by
CPI
Court Rejects T-Mobile’s Appeal Bid in Antitrust Case Over Sprint Merger
May 19, 2024 by
CPI
Google Requests Judge, Not Jury, to Decide on Antitrust Case
May 19, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Ecosystems
May 9, 2024 by
CPI
Mapping Antitrust onto Digital Ecosystems
May 9, 2024 by
CPI
Ecosystems and Competition Law: A Law and Political Economy Approach
May 9, 2024 by
CPI
Ecosystem Theories of Harm: What is Beyond the Buzzword?
May 9, 2024 by
CPI
Open Ecosystems: Benefits, Challenges, and Implications for Antitrust
May 9, 2024 by
CPI