As news broke this week that the US International Trade Commission has sided with Samsung, the tech giant that accused Apple Inc. of infringing on its patents with the iPhone 4, the major question now remains of whether President Barack Obama will let the ruling – which bans imports of the iPhone 4, as well as other older models of the iPhone and iPad, into the US – stick, or if he will veto it. According to reports, the decision by the International Trade Commission is particularly troublesome, as Congress has previously come to the consensus that standard essential patent holders like Samsung should not be able to seek important bans from the ICT and violate their promise to license those patents under FRAND terms. The ICT’s decision also comes in the same week President Obama announced patent reform proposals.
Featured News
Why Prediction Markets Are Keeping Compliance Chiefs Up at Night
Apr 3, 2026 by
CPI
Gaps in the National Polic Framework on AI Leave State Regulations in Limbo, Report Claims
Apr 3, 2026 by
CPI
Federal Judge Narrows Yardi Antitrust Lawsuit, Dismisses Out-of-State Defendants
Apr 2, 2026 by
CPI
Italian Regulator Fines Revolut €11 Million Over Alleged Misleading Practices
Apr 2, 2026 by
CPI
Justice Department Challenges Decision Stopping Anthropic AI Ban
Apr 2, 2026 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Competitor Collaborations
Mar 26, 2026 by
CPI
Between Scylla and Charybdis – Navigating Transatlantic Antitrust Currents
Mar 26, 2026 by
Tilman Kuhn & Niklas Brüggemann
Cartel Enforcement Moves Into the Labor Market: Trends and Implications
Mar 26, 2026 by
Andreas Kafetzopoulos & Caroline Janssens
Rethinking Buy-Side Antitrust “Group Boycotts”
Mar 26, 2026 by
Craig Falls & Brendan McGuire
Positive Collaborations: The Tools Available to Competition Authorities to Encourage Beneficial Interactions Between Competitors
Mar 26, 2026 by
Rona Bar-Isaac & Thomas Withers