Two vitamin C manufacturers based in China are reportedly arguing in a New York court that their government is responsible for their price-fixing. A class-action suit has been filed in US District Court in New York accusing two vitamin C companies of raising prices between December 2001 and June 2006. The media are reporting that the defendants will use the foreign sovereign compulsion doctrine defense, a rare argument that claims companies that break US law are protected if their own governments coerced the companies into that legal violation. The defense is seldom successful, say experts. Jury selection was scheduled for Monday.
Featured News
Wave of Departures Hits Justice Department’s Antitrust Division
Apr 8, 2026 by
CPI
AI-Powered Shopping by Google Raises New Competition Questions
Apr 8, 2026 by
CPI
SEC Fills Top Enforcement Role Following Resignation
Apr 8, 2026 by
CPI
Anthropic Joins Forces With Amazon, Microsoft, Apple on Cyber Defense AI
Apr 8, 2026 by
CPI
Hungary Competition Official Alleges Political Pressure as Election Nears
Apr 8, 2026 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Competitor Collaborations
Mar 26, 2026 by
CPI
Between Scylla and Charybdis – Navigating Transatlantic Antitrust Currents
Mar 26, 2026 by
Tilman Kuhn & Niklas Brüggemann
Cartel Enforcement Moves Into the Labor Market: Trends and Implications
Mar 26, 2026 by
Andreas Kafetzopoulos & Caroline Janssens
Rethinking Buy-Side Antitrust “Group Boycotts”
Mar 26, 2026 by
Craig Falls & Brendan McGuire
Positive Collaborations: The Tools Available to Competition Authorities to Encourage Beneficial Interactions Between Competitors
Mar 26, 2026 by
Rona Bar-Isaac & Thomas Withers