U.S.: Medical supply distributor accuses cos of predatory pricing, wants $200M
Two medical supply companies, Cardinal Health Inc. and Owens & Minor Inc., were served a lawsuit seeking $200 million from the companies for alleged anticompetitive behavior. Suture Express Inc., a distributor of specialty medical supplies, is claiming that the two companies abused their dominant positions in the market to punish healthcare providers who bought their supplies from Suture Express. Specifically, the lawsuit says that Cardinal Health and Owens & Minor threatened their customers with a “predatory pricing” surcharge of up to 5 percent on additional products if those customers did not also buy their suture and endomechanical supplies from them; the supplies are used in the process of stitching and minimally-invasive medical procedures.
Featured News
Federal Judge Narrows Yardi Antitrust Lawsuit, Dismisses Out-of-State Defendants
Apr 2, 2026 by
CPI
Italian Regulator Fines Revolut €11 Million Over Alleged Misleading Practices
Apr 2, 2026 by
CPI
Justice Department Challenges Decision Stopping Anthropic AI Ban
Apr 2, 2026 by
CPI
Ivy League Wins Antitrust Case Over Athletic Scholarship Policy
Apr 2, 2026 by
CPI
Maine Set to Become First State to Ban AI Data Centers
Apr 2, 2026 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Competitor Collaborations
Mar 26, 2026 by
CPI
Between Scylla and Charybdis – Navigating Transatlantic Antitrust Currents
Mar 26, 2026 by
Tilman Kuhn & Niklas Brüggemann
Cartel Enforcement Moves Into the Labor Market: Trends and Implications
Mar 26, 2026 by
Andreas Kafetzopoulos & Caroline Janssens
Rethinking Buy-Side Antitrust “Group Boycotts”
Mar 26, 2026 by
Craig Falls & Brendan McGuire
Positive Collaborations: The Tools Available to Competition Authorities to Encourage Beneficial Interactions Between Competitors
Mar 26, 2026 by
Rona Bar-Isaac & Thomas Withers