A federal judge has tossed out a case against Facebook alleging the social network company broke antitrust law by banning its users from using a product that changes the layout of a Facebook page and swaps out advertisements. U.S. District Judge Cathy Ann Bencivengo threw out the case first initiated by Sambreel, an advertising company that offers products that allow such modifications of a Facebook page through its programs like PageRage. In response to the software, Facebook told its users that they could not log into Facebook unless they disabled RagePage; such was the source of Sambreel’s antitrust suit. Judge Bencivengo justified tossing out the case by saying “[t]here is no fundamental right to use Facebook.” Experts say that the judge’s siding with Facebook may have, in part, been due to Sambreel’s tactics in getting people to use its programs, essentially tricking them into downloading the software.
Featured News
New York Puts Businesses on Notice for Algorithmic Pricing
Mar 19, 2026 by
CPI
Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer Expands US Antitrust Team with New Partner Hire
Mar 19, 2026 by
CPI
Mexico Antitrust Authority Fines Oxygen Suppliers Over Exclusive Contracts
Mar 19, 2026 by
CPI
EU Cloud Group Pushes for Halt to Broadcom VMware Changes
Mar 19, 2026 by
CPI
Sen. Blackburn Releases Discussion Draft of Bill to Set Federal ‘Framework’ for AI Policy
Mar 19, 2026 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Data-Driven Competition
Mar 19, 2026 by
CPI
Data-Driven Competition: Implications For Enforcement and Merger Control
Mar 19, 2026 by
Alexandre de Corniere & Greg Taylor
From Tipping to Trustees: Why Data-Driven Markets Require Institutional Design, Not Optimization
Mar 19, 2026 by
Jens Prüfer & Paul de Bijl
Data Barriers to Entry: What We’ve Learned About Spotting Them and What We Still Don’t Know About Solutions
Mar 19, 2026 by
Bruno Carballa-Smichowski
When the Perfect Is the Enemy of the Good: Price Discrimination, Affordability, Precarity and Market Dynamism
Mar 19, 2026 by
Dan Ciuriak