A federal judge has tossed out a case against Facebook alleging the social network company broke antitrust law by banning its users from using a product that changes the layout of a Facebook page and swaps out advertisements. U.S. District Judge Cathy Ann Bencivengo threw out the case first initiated by Sambreel, an advertising company that offers products that allow such modifications of a Facebook page through its programs like PageRage. In response to the software, Facebook told its users that they could not log into Facebook unless they disabled RagePage; such was the source of Sambreel’s antitrust suit. Judge Bencivengo justified tossing out the case by saying “[t]here is no fundamental right to use Facebook.” Experts say that the judge’s siding with Facebook may have, in part, been due to Sambreel’s tactics in getting people to use its programs, essentially tricking them into downloading the software.
Featured News
FTC Challenges StubHub’s Pricing Model in Federal Court Filing
Apr 9, 2026 by
CPI
Apple Seeks International Help to Obtain Samsung Evidence in DOJ Antitrust Case
Apr 9, 2026 by
CPI
Spain Opens Antitrust Probe Into Insurers
Apr 9, 2026 by
CPI
Utah Wants to Solve Washington’s AI Deadlock. Here’s How.
Apr 9, 2026 by
CPI
Justice Department Opens Investigation Into NFL Media Practices
Apr 9, 2026 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Competitor Collaborations
Mar 26, 2026 by
CPI
Between Scylla and Charybdis – Navigating Transatlantic Antitrust Currents
Mar 26, 2026 by
Tilman Kuhn & Niklas Brüggemann
Cartel Enforcement Moves Into the Labor Market: Trends and Implications
Mar 26, 2026 by
Andreas Kafetzopoulos & Caroline Janssens
Rethinking Buy-Side Antitrust “Group Boycotts”
Mar 26, 2026 by
Craig Falls & Brendan McGuire
Positive Collaborations: The Tools Available to Competition Authorities to Encourage Beneficial Interactions Between Competitors
Mar 26, 2026 by
Rona Bar-Isaac & Thomas Withers