Chicken Suppliers Agree to Settle Price-Fixing Claims in Multi-Million Dollar Deal
In a significant development, major chicken suppliers including Perdue and Sanderson have reached a settlement in a long-standing legal battle over allegations of price-fixing. The agreement, which also involves other poultry producers, follows claims of conspiring to inflate prices, resulting in substantial overcharges for food distributors over the years.
Plaintiffs’ attorneys, representing a class action of direct purchasers of chicken, revealed in a court filing on Thursday their intention to seek preliminary approval from a federal judge in Chicago for the newly proposed settlements.
While the specific terms of the agreements were not immediately disclosed, the companies involved have consistently denied any wrongdoing, reporting Reuters.
Sanderson, which merged last year to form Oakwood, Georgia-based Wayne-Sanderson, along with Perdue, were among the defendants named in the settlement filing. Notably, they had previously secured victories in legal proceedings against the plaintiffs’ claims. However, the plaintiffs had contested these outcomes, leading to the current round of settlements.
Read more: Koch Reaches Settlement with DOJ Over Chicken Supplier Practices
The litigation has been ongoing, with consumers, direct purchasers of chicken, and commercial plaintiffs such as restaurants and grocery stores accusing the defendants of collusion to maintain artificially high prices. Allegations included tactics like production curbing and sharing nonpublic data about supply and demand to manipulate prices in their favor.
The settlement marks another chapter in this complex legal saga, with prior agreements already totaling more than $284 million with other chicken producers. Direct-purchaser plaintiffs in this case include well-known entities such as Maplevale Farms in New York, Pennsylvania-based John Gross & Company, and New Jersey’s Ferraro Foods.
Earlier settlements with other industry giants have been notable, with Tyson agreeing in 2021 to pay $80 million to direct purchaser plaintiffs, while Pilgrim’s Pride settled for $75 million in the same year.
Source: Reuters
Featured News
Uruguayan Antitrust Scrutiny Puts Major Meatpacking Deal Between Marfrig and Minerva on Hold
May 19, 2024 by
CPI
Alaska Airlines Seeks Dismissal of Consumer Lawsuit Over $1.9 Billion Hawaiian Airlines Buy
May 19, 2024 by
CPI
Idaho Attorney General Orders Split of Kootenai Health and Syringa Hospital
May 19, 2024 by
CPI
Court Rejects T-Mobile’s Appeal Bid in Antitrust Case Over Sprint Merger
May 19, 2024 by
CPI
Google Requests Judge, Not Jury, to Decide on Antitrust Case
May 19, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Ecosystems
May 9, 2024 by
CPI
Mapping Antitrust onto Digital Ecosystems
May 9, 2024 by
CPI
Ecosystems and Competition Law: A Law and Political Economy Approach
May 9, 2024 by
CPI
Ecosystem Theories of Harm: What is Beyond the Buzzword?
May 9, 2024 by
CPI
Open Ecosystems: Benefits, Challenges, and Implications for Antitrust
May 9, 2024 by
CPI