A PYMNTS Company

Major Antitrust Rulings Signal Change for EU Soccer Governance

By  |  December 16, 2024

Professional soccer in Europe is poised for significant changes following a series of antitrust rulings that challenge the current governance structures of FIFA and UEFA. These decisions, according to Reuters, underscore the need for reform in the rules governing participation in competitions, team composition, and player movement across teams. The legal outcomes have also drawn parallels to similar challenges faced by other sports, such as professional swimming and collegiate athletics in the United States.

    Get the Full Story

    Complete the form to unlock this article and enjoy unlimited free access to all PYMNTS content — no additional logins required.

    yesSubscribe to our daily newsletter, PYMNTS Today.

    By completing this form, you agree to receive marketing communications from PYMNTS and to the sharing of your information with our sponsor, if applicable, in accordance with our Privacy Policy and Terms and Conditions.

    At the center of these rulings is the question of whether FIFA, the global governing body for soccer, and UEFA, its European counterpart, hold a dominant position that violates European antitrust laws. Recent judgments, including one by the European Court of Justice (CJEU), have highlighted the potential for these organizations to abuse their positions of economic and monetary control over soccer competitions and related commercial rights.

    The European Super League and Antitrust Scrutiny

    We’d love to be your preferred source for news.

    Please add us to your preferred sources list so our news, data and interviews show up in your feed. Thanks!

    Add as Preferred Source

    A critical test of this issue arose with the proposed European Super League, an alternative competition that sought to rival existing UEFA tournaments. FIFA and UEFA had sought to prevent teams from joining this new league and threatened sanctions against participants, sparking legal challenges that reached the CJEU.

    The court found that the rules set by FIFA and UEFA could indeed restrict trade if they were not founded on clear, transparent, and non-discriminatory principles. According to Reuters, the CJEU noted that the governing bodies’ economic monopoly over organizing and marketing events, as well as their control over financial and commercial rights, placed them in a potentially dominant position. Without substantive safeguards, these rules risked constituting an abuse of dominance under EU competition law.

    Read more: Antitrust Authority Fines Italian Soccer Federation €4.03 Million

    Following the CJEU’s guidance, the case returned to a national court, which ultimately ruled that FIFA and UEFA’s regulations did not meet the necessary legal standards, rendering them unlawful. This outcome affirms the rights of alternative competitions to establish themselves, provided governing bodies fail to implement fair and objective procedures to regulate such endeavors.

    Broader Implications for Sports Governance

    These legal decisions are likely to have far-reaching consequences beyond soccer. They signal a shift toward stricter oversight of governing bodies’ roles in managing sports competitions, requiring greater accountability and adherence to antitrust laws. In professional swimming, for example, similar legal challenges have emerged, with disputes over participation in alternative leagues like the International Swimming League.

    In the United States, the governance of collegiate athletics has also faced scrutiny, particularly regarding restrictions on athlete transfers and team composition. These developments, according to Reuters, highlight a global trend toward rethinking how sports organizations balance their regulatory authority with the principles of fair competition and market access.