Meta Platforms’ WhatsApp has received a favorable opinion from an adviser to the European Union’s highest court in its ongoing challenge against a privacy-related fine imposed by the Irish data protection authority. According to Reuters, the dispute stems from a decision made by the European Data Protection Board (EDPB) to increase the financial penalty for privacy violations.
In 2021, Ireland’s data protection regulator levied a fine of 225 million euros ($242.2 million) on WhatsApp after reviewing complaints about its handling of personal data in the country. Per Reuters, the EDPB played a crucial role in escalating the penalty.
We’d love to be your preferred source for news.
Please add us to your preferred sources list so our news, data and interviews show up in your feed. Thanks!
WhatsApp initially sought to contest the decision, but in 2022, a lower tribunal ruled that the messaging service had no legal standing to challenge the EDPB directly. The tribunal, however, stated that WhatsApp could still take legal action in a national court regarding the fine imposed by Ireland.
Related: WhatsApp Faces EU Oversight After Surpassing DSA User Threshold
WhatsApp subsequently brought its case before the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU), arguing against the earlier ruling. On Thursday, CJEU Advocate General Tamara Capeta criticized the lower tribunal’s reasoning, asserting that WhatsApp’s challenge should be considered valid.
“WhatsApp’s challenge of the EDPB decision is admissible and the case should be referred back to the General Court for a decision on the merit,” Capeta stated in a non-binding opinion. The CJEU typically follows the recommendations of its advisers in approximately 80% of cases, meaning the final ruling, expected in the coming months, could align with Capeta’s opinion.
The outcome of this case, officially registered as C-97/23 P WhatsApp Ireland Ltd v European Data Protection Board, could have broader implications for tech companies navigating EU privacy regulations.
Source: Reuters
Featured News
Fifth Circuit Orders Google Antitrust Case Moved to California
Apr 7, 2026 by
CPI
Federal Appeals Court Sides With CFTC on Jurisdiction Over Prediction Markets
Apr 7, 2026 by
CPI
Wilson Sonsini Bolsters Hong Kong Office With New Antitrust Partner
Apr 7, 2026 by
CPI
IMF Highlights Risks From Tokenized Finance and Stablecoins in New Report
Apr 7, 2026 by
CPI
Senators Propose Bill to End Tax Breaks for Large Corporate Mergers
Apr 7, 2026 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Competitor Collaborations
Mar 26, 2026 by
CPI
Between Scylla and Charybdis – Navigating Transatlantic Antitrust Currents
Mar 26, 2026 by
Tilman Kuhn & Niklas Brüggemann
Cartel Enforcement Moves Into the Labor Market: Trends and Implications
Mar 26, 2026 by
Andreas Kafetzopoulos & Caroline Janssens
Rethinking Buy-Side Antitrust “Group Boycotts”
Mar 26, 2026 by
Craig Falls & Brendan McGuire
Positive Collaborations: The Tools Available to Competition Authorities to Encourage Beneficial Interactions Between Competitors
Mar 26, 2026 by
Rona Bar-Isaac & Thomas Withers