
Apple’s bid to intervene in the high-profile federal antitrust case against Google has been rejected by the DC Circuit Court of Appeals, reaffirming an earlier decision by US District Court Judge Amit Mehta. The ruling effectively blocks Apple from taking a formal role in the remedies phase of the case, which could impact its lucrative search agreement with Google.
According to The Verge, Apple had sought a limited role in the proceedings but was denied in February. The company then appealed, arguing that its interests were directly tied to the outcome of the case. However, the court sided with the original ruling, stating that Apple had waited too long to file its motion—submitting it on December 23, 2023, for a trial that began in 2020.
As a result, Apple will have to rely on external briefings rather than direct participation to express its concerns, The Verge reports. The exclusivity deal in question allows Google to remain the default search engine on Apple devices, a partnership reportedly worth $18 billion in 2021 and $20 billion in 2022.
Read more: Apple Ordered by EU to Open Ecosystem to Rivals, Faces Potential Fines
One of Apple’s key concerns, as noted in its December motion, was preserving its ability to “reach other arrangements with Google.” However, per The Verge, the Justice Department recently modified its proposed final judgment to allow Google to continue paying Apple for services unrelated to search.
The antitrust case against Google has been a landmark legal battle, with the Department of Justice successfully proving that the tech giant holds an illegal monopoly over search and digital advertising. The next phase of the case will determine remedies, with proposals that could include forcing Google to divest from its Chrome browser and adjust its Android business operations.
Source: The Verge
Featured News
Indian Ad Agencies Warned Against WhatsApp Discussions After Antitrust Raids
Apr 17, 2025 by
CPI
US Court Ruling Against Google Spurs Fresh Antitrust Tensions in Europe
Apr 17, 2025 by
CPI
AstraZeneca Accused of Stifling Biosimilar Competition for Rare Disease Drug
Apr 17, 2025 by
CPI
EU AI Act Technical Standards Delayed Until Next Year
Apr 17, 2025 by
CPI
Justice Department Appoints New Trustee to Oversee T-Mobile/Sprint Deal
Apr 17, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – The Airline Industry
Apr 10, 2025 by
CPI
Boosting Competition in International Aviation
Apr 10, 2025 by
Jeffrey N. Shane
Reshaping Competition Policy for the U.S. Airline Industry
Apr 10, 2025 by
Diana L. Moss
Algorithmic Collusion in the Skies: The Role of AI in Shaping Airline Competition
Apr 10, 2025 by
Qi Ge, Myongjin Kim & Nicholas Rupp
Competition in U.S. Airline Markets: Major Developments and Economic Insights
Apr 10, 2025 by
Germán Bet