
Apple secured a legal victory in a federal antitrust case alleging the company unlawfully tied its iCloud storage service to its mobile devices, according to Reuters. U.S. District Judge Eumi K. Lee ruled that the plaintiffs had failed to sufficiently support their claim that Apple engaged in illegal market manipulation.
The lawsuit, initially filed in March 2024, argued that Apple forced consumers to use its iCloud storage by restricting certain data backups to its own platform. However, per Reuters, Judge Lee ruled on February 28 that no Apple device user is required to purchase iCloud or any cloud storage service, undermining the central premise of the lawsuit.
In her decision, Judge Lee found that the plaintiffs had not plausibly demonstrated Apple’s dominance in the cloud storage market. The ruling also noted that Apple allows third-party services for photo and video storage, though it limits backup options for restricted data files needed for device restoration. Apple has maintained that these policies are in place to ensure security.
Related: Apple Faces £3 Billion Lawsuit in UK Over iCloud Monopoly Allegations
Despite dismissing the case, Judge Lee left the door open for plaintiffs to amend their complaint and refile it. According to Reuters, attorney Steve Berman, representing the plaintiffs, stated that they plan to revise the lawsuit to address the court’s concerns.
The proposed class action aimed to represent tens of millions of U.S. consumers who pay for iCloud storage. One named plaintiff, a Los Angeles resident, claimed she paid $2.99 per month for an iCloud plan. The lawsuit sought to prove that Apple’s policies forced consumers to pay more for storage options.
In response to Apple’s motion to dismiss, the company defended its cloud storage policies as a means of maintaining security and user experience. Judge Lee noted that if Apple’s pricing was as high as the lawsuit suggested, competitors would likely be incentivized to offer better alternatives.
Source: Reuters
Featured News
House Judiciary Committee Examines Antitrust Issues in Medical Residency Market
Mar 17, 2025 by
CPI
Belgian Competition Authority Accuses Roche of Anticompetitive Practices in Cancer Drug Market
Mar 17, 2025 by
CPI
PepsiCo to Acquire Prebiotic Soda Brand Poppi for $1.95 Billion
Mar 17, 2025 by
CPI
Tech Companies Face Tightened Online Safety Rules in the UK, Starting Monday
Mar 17, 2025 by
CPI
UK Government to Tighten Merger Scrutiny in New Plan by Chancellor Reeves
Mar 17, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Self-Preferencing
Feb 26, 2025 by
CPI
Platform Self-Preferencing: Focusing the Policy Debate
Feb 26, 2025 by
Michael Katz
Weaponized Opacity: Self-Preferencing in Digital Audience Measurement
Feb 26, 2025 by
Thomas Hoppner & Philipp Westerhoff
Self-Preferencing: An Economic Literature-Based Assessment Advocating a Case-By-Case Approach and Compliance Requirements
Feb 26, 2025 by
Patrice Bougette & Frederic Marty
Self-Preferencing in Adjacent Markets
Feb 26, 2025 by
Muxin Li