
Australia’s competition watchdog, the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC), has raised significant competition concerns regarding Singapore-based Olam Agri’s proposed acquisition of Namoi Cotton for A$144.9 million (S$130.8 million).
The acquisition bid has sparked an international bidding war between Olam Agri, an affiliate of Singapore’s Olam Group, and the Dutch commodity merchant Louis Dreyfus Company. Both firms aim to expand their presence in Australia, a key market for cotton production and processing.
Olam Agri, operating through its subsidiary Queensland Cotton, and Namoi Cotton are major players in the Australian cotton industry. Both companies provide a range of services including cotton ginning, cotton lint classing, logistics, and warehousing. They are also involved in the acquisition and marketing of cotton lint and cottonseed.
Stephen Ridgeway, a commissioner at the ACCC, expressed concerns about the potential reduction in competition if the acquisition proceeds. “The proposed acquisition would reduce the number of competing ginning suppliers in the Lower Namoi Valley from three to two, with Olam operating four of the five cotton gins if the acquisition proceeds,” Ridgeway stated.
Read more: The ACCC’s Ongoing Digital Platforms Services Inquiry: Regulatory Reform
This consolidation would leave only one alternative cotton gin in the Lower Namoi Valley region, operated by Australian Food and Fibre. The ACCC is worried that this reduction in competition could lead to higher prices for cotton growers in the region and could negatively impact the supply of cotton lint classing services across Australia.
The regulator emphasized the importance of maintaining a competitive market to prevent adverse effects on pricing and service quality for cotton producers. The concerns raised by the ACCC highlight the potential risks associated with the merger and its impact on the broader Australian cotton industry.
Source: Straits Times
Featured News
House Passes ‘Take It Down Act,’ the First Major AI-Related Federal Regulation
Apr 29, 2025 by
CPI
Michigan Sues Express Scripts, Prime Therapeutics for Alleged Price-Fixing Scheme
Apr 29, 2025 by
CPI
Tech Rivals Testify as FTC Antitrust Trial Against Meta Enters Defining Phase
Apr 29, 2025 by
CPI
Spanish Judge Investigates Nationwide Blackout as Possible Cyber Threat
Apr 29, 2025 by
CPI
Trump Administration Pushes EU to Delay AI Regulations
Apr 29, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Mergers in Digital Markets
Apr 21, 2025 by
CPI
Catching a Killer? Six “Genetic Markers” to Assess Nascent Competitor Acquisitions
Apr 21, 2025 by
John Taladay & Christine Ryu-Naya
Digital Decoded: Is There More Scope for Digital Mergers In 2025?
Apr 21, 2025 by
Colin Raftery, Michele Davis, Sarah Jensen & Martin Dickson
AI In the Mix – An Ever-Evolving Approach to Jurisdiction Over Digital Mergers in Europe
Apr 21, 2025 by
Ingrid Vandenborre & Ketevan Zukakishvili
Antitrust Enforcement Errors Due to a Failure to Understand Organizational Capabilities and Dynamic Competition
Apr 21, 2025 by
Magdalena Kuyterink & David J. Teece