Brazilian Supreme Court Lifts Freeze on Starlink Accounts, Transfers $3.3 Million to National Treasury
Brazil’s Supreme Court has lifted the freeze on Starlink’s bank accounts, following a decision by Justice Alexandre de Moraes to transfer 18.35 million reais (approximately $3.3 million) from the accounts to the national treasury. This move was announced in a court statement released on Friday.
According to Reuters, the decision to unfreeze Starlink’s accounts was based on the fact that the transferred amount matched the total fines owed by X (formerly Twitter) to Brazil. The fines had been levied amid ongoing disputes between the platform’s billionaire owner Elon Musk and Justice Moraes.
Per Reuters, the legal entanglement began when Moraes imposed restrictions on X in Brazil, including blocking access to the social media platform in the country. This measure was taken after X allegedly failed to comply with orders to block accounts accused of spreading misinformation and hate speech, which Moraes deemed a threat to democratic processes.
Read more: FCC Chair Calls for More Competition to SpaceX’s Starlink Network
The situation escalated when X also did not comply with Brazilian laws requiring the designation of a local legal representative and missed a compliance deadline. This led Moraes to freeze Starlink’s accounts as a potential means to cover the fines owed by X.
Despite the lifting of the account freezes, the Supreme Court has maintained its decision to block X in Brazil. According to Reuters, this stance remains in place due to ongoing issues related to X’s failure to appoint a local representative and non-compliance with content removal orders imposed by Moraes.
Elon Musk, who owns X and has a significant stake in Starlink’s parent company SpaceX, has publicly criticized the court’s actions, labeling them as “censorship.” Musk also serves as the CEO of Tesla, an electric vehicle manufacturer.
Source: Reuters
Featured News
CVS Health Explores Potential Breakup Amid Investor Pressure: Report
Oct 3, 2024 by
CPI
DirecTV Acquires Dish TV, Creating 20 Million-Subscriber Powerhouse
Oct 3, 2024 by
CPI
South Korea Fines Kakao Mobility $54.8 Million for Anti-Competitive Practices
Oct 3, 2024 by
CPI
Google Offers Settlement in India’s Antitrust Case Regarding Smart TVs
Oct 3, 2024 by
CPI
Attorney Challenges NCAA’s $2.78 Billion Settlement in Landmark Antitrust Cases
Oct 3, 2024 by
nhoch@pymnts.com
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Refusal to Deal
Sep 27, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust’s Refusal-to-Deal Doctrine: The Emperor Has No Clothes
Sep 27, 2024 by
Erik Hovenkamp
Why All Antitrust Claims are Refusal to Deal Claims and What that Means for Policy
Sep 27, 2024 by
Ramsi Woodcock
The Aspen Misadventure
Sep 27, 2024 by
Roger Blair & Holly P. Stidham
Refusal to Deal in Antitrust Law: Evolving Jurisprudence and Business Justifications in the Align Technology Case
Sep 27, 2024 by
Timothy Hsieh