Canada: California’s electricity crisis has British Columbia giant on defensive
A massive legal case concerning money made by British Columbia more than 10 years ago at the expense of California’s energy crisis has BC and an electricity giant on the defensive. A US Federal Energy Regulatory Commission judge ruled earlier this month that the state of California could potentially collect $1.6 billion from power companies – including BC Hydro’s subsidiary Powerex – as a result of energy price hikes between 2000 and 2001. Energy costs jumped up to 900 percent at the time, leading to price-fixing allegations and specifically accusing companies of selling BC Hydro’s energy when prices were high, then selling energy to Canada when prices dropped, according to the court ruling. British Columbia’s Energy Minister Rich Coleman has denied any wrongdoing and said BC will continue to fight the allegations. Powerex says it expects another five years of court fighting in a case that has already lasted 12.
Featured News
Croatia Competition Authority Approves HPB Acquisition of Croatia Banka
Jul 19, 2026 by
CPI
Democratic Lawmakers Urge DOJ to Closely Examine Fox-Roku Merger
Jul 19, 2026 by
CPI
US Judge Clears Path for Broad Beef Antitrust Class Actions Against Major Meatpackers
Jul 19, 2026 by
CPI
India’s Competition Regulator Dismisses Antitrust Complaint Against Reliance Jio and 4,500 Firms
Jul 19, 2026 by
CPI
Apple Opens Early Settlement Discussions With DOJ
Jul 17, 2026 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Agentic AI & Antitrust
Jul 16, 2026 by
CPI
AI Agents and Collusion: The Two Faces of Agentic AI
Jul 16, 2026 by
Giovanna Massarotto
Agentic AI’s Regulatory Conundrum
Jul 16, 2026 by
Anant Raut
Inter-AI-Agent Competition
Jul 16, 2026 by
Stefan Thomas
Navigating the Increasing Regulatory Scrutiny of AI-Pricing Tools: Competition and Other Emerging Risks
Jul 16, 2026 by
Mark Krotoski & Vinny Sidhu