Chile’s TDLC has weighed in once again on the Barnechea case, rejecting the appeal presented by the National Association of Professional Football and again favoring the capital city squad.
The ruling says that the request is “not taken into consideration, as any consent given by a subject to a conduct or act that is accused of being anticompetitive, does not prevent the knowledge of such conduct or act by this Court.”
The ANFP had appealed to the TDLC’s decision to allow Barnechea to play in the Primera B tournament and not to pay the 50,000 UF of joining the category after the club was sanctioned by the governing body of national football for not complying on time with the requirement.
Full Content: AS Chile
Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.
Featured News
Former DOJ Antitrust Chief Megan Lewis Joins McGuireWoods as Partner
Oct 3, 2024 by
nhoch@pymnts.com
Tech Rivals Push for EU Crackdown on Microsoft Edge Dominance
Oct 3, 2024 by
CPI
Pork Industry Faces Legal Challenges as Antitrust Lawsuits Against Seaboard Foods Dismissed
Oct 2, 2024 by
CPI
CMA Strengthens Investigation with Advisory Panel of Veterinary Experts
Oct 2, 2024 by
CPI
US Merchants Sue Visa, Alleging Unfair Dominance in Debit Card Market
Oct 2, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Refusal to Deal
Sep 27, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust’s Refusal-to-Deal Doctrine: The Emperor Has No Clothes
Sep 27, 2024 by
Erik Hovenkamp
Why All Antitrust Claims are Refusal to Deal Claims and What that Means for Policy
Sep 27, 2024 by
Ramsi Woodcock
The Aspen Misadventure
Sep 27, 2024 by
Roger Blair & Holly P. Stidham
Refusal to Deal in Antitrust Law: Evolving Jurisprudence and Business Justifications in the Align Technology Case
Sep 27, 2024 by
Timothy Hsieh