
Clorox used its involvement in national standard-setting organizations to develop and file an early patent application and create a monopoly for its Brita water filter, a rival startup alleges in a new lawsuit.
Water filtration startup Zero Technologies filed the anti-competition lawsuit against Brita and The Clorox Oct. 6 in a Pennsylvania federal court, alleging violations of federal antitrust laws.
According to the lawsuit, Clorox — which makes the Brita water filter — used its involvement in the industry’s standard-setting organizations to secretly plan and execute a “patent ambush” for water filters, using information gathered through the standards bodies.
The lawsuit alleges that the Brita patent licensing conspiracy dates back to 2007.
It was then that the National Sanitation Foundation (NSF International) and the American National Standards Institute (ANSI) issued guidelines for what kind of health standards would be required for water filter makers to receive certifications, the lawsuit says.
Brita allegedly participated in the guidelines process and then used that knowledge to “develop a patent essential to the standard and lay its plan for a patent ‘ambush’ of the industry after over a decade of ongoing deception,” the lawsuit claims.
Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world. Clorox & Brita
Featured News
Meta’s $220 Million Fine in Nigeria Upheld by Competition Tribunal
Apr 27, 2025 by
CPI
DoorDash Proposes $3.6 Billion Acquisition of Deliveroo
Apr 27, 2025 by
CPI
US Judge Delays Approval of $2.8 Billion NCAA Settlement Over Athlete Rights
Apr 27, 2025 by
CPI
US Launches Criminal Antitrust Probe Into TP-Link’s Pricing Practices
Apr 27, 2025 by
CPI
CK Hutchison’s $22.8 Billion Port Sale to BlackRock Draws Chinese Scrutiny
Apr 27, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Mergers in Digital Markets
Apr 21, 2025 by
CPI
Catching a Killer? Six “Genetic Markers” to Assess Nascent Competitor Acquisitions
Apr 21, 2025 by
John Taladay & Christine Ryu-Naya
Digital Decoded: Is There More Scope for Digital Mergers In 2025?
Apr 21, 2025 by
Colin Raftery, Michele Davis, Sarah Jensen & Martin Dickson
AI In the Mix – An Ever-Evolving Approach to Jurisdiction Over Digital Mergers in Europe
Apr 21, 2025 by
Ingrid Vandenborre & Ketevan Zukakishvili
Antitrust Enforcement Errors Due to a Failure to Understand Organizational Capabilities and Dynamic Competition
Apr 21, 2025 by
Magdalena Kuyterink & David J. Teece