A PYMNTS Company

Danish Furniture Brand Hübsch Fined €670,000 in Price-Fixing Case

 |  November 1, 2026
price-fixing

Danish interior design company Hübsch has agreed to pay a 5 million-krone ($ equivalent of approximately €670,000) fine after acknowledging that it coordinated pricing decisions with rival Broste Copenhagen during the Covid-19 pandemic, according to a report published by industry news outlet InteriorDaily.

    Get the Full Story

    Complete the form to unlock this article and enjoy unlimited free access to all PYMNTS content — no additional logins required.

    Subscribe to our daily newsletter, PYMNTS Today.

    By completing this form, you agree to receive marketing communications from PYMNTS and to the sharing of your information with our sponsor, if applicable, in accordance with our Privacy Policy and Terms and Conditions.

    The settlement follows an investigation by the Danish Competition and Consumer Authority into communications between the two furniture and home furnishings businesses. The companies discussed how to recover escalating transportation expenses from customers, including the possibility of applying an additional pandemic-related charge to orders, InteriorDaily reported.

    We’d love to be your preferred source for news.

    Please add us to your preferred sources list so our news, data and interviews show up in your feed. Thanks!

    The arrangement was found to breach Denmark’s Competition Act, which prohibits agreements between competitors that restrict competition. The case was resolved at Denmark’s Maritime and Commercial Court, where Hübsch accepted the penalty and acknowledged its involvement in the unlawful conduct.

    According to InteriorDaily, evidence examined during the investigation included an internal email indicating that Hübsch’s director at the time wanted the pricing arrangement to remain confidential. The communication raised concerns about drawing attention to the discussions between the competing businesses.

    The case centers on commercial decisions made during the pandemic, when disruptions to international supply chains and higher freight costs placed significant financial pressure on furniture manufacturers and distributors.

    Although businesses were confronting similar increases in operating expenses, coordination between competitors over how those costs would be passed on to customers raised concerns under Danish competition law.

    The investigation highlights the legal distinction between companies independently adjusting prices in response to market conditions and competing businesses coordinating their pricing strategies.

    The settlement resolves Hübsch’s involvement in the case. According to InteriorDaily, it remains unclear whether Broste Copenhagen will face a separate penalty.