
On Tuesday, Deutsche Telekom secured a significant legal victory as the European Union’s highest court ruled in its favor, mandating that EU antitrust regulators pay interest on a reimbursed portion of a fine. This ruling could set a positive precedent for other companies with similar claims, including Intel, which is pursuing a 593-million-euro ($638 million) claim, according to a Reuters report.
In recent years, numerous companies have sought compensation for default interest on fines related to annulled antitrust cases, with total claims amounting to approximately 800 million euros. Intel’s case is the most prominent among these, underscoring the widespread impact of the court’s decision.
The case traces back to 2014 when the European Commission imposed a 31-million-euro fine on Deutsche Telekom for charging unfair wholesale prices in Slovakia. A lower tribunal later reduced this penalty to 19 million euros and ordered the Commission to pay around 1.8 million euros in interest. However, the EU competition enforcer initially repaid the difference but did not include the interest for the period between the payment and reimbursement.
Read more: EU Court Rules Deutsche Telekom’s Slovak Business Cannot Avoid Fine
The Luxembourg-based Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) sided with Deutsche Telekom, emphasizing that the European Commission must pay interest on fines it has unduly imposed and provisionally collected. “That interest is intended to compensate, at a standard rate, the undertaking concerned for the loss of enjoyment of the amount in question,” the judges stated.
The ruling specified that the applicable interest rate is the European Central Bank refinancing rate plus 3.5 percentage points. A Commission spokesperson acknowledged the judgment, stating, “The Commission will carefully study the judgment and assess its implications.”
Source: Reuters
Featured News
Boeing to Sell Key Digital Aviation Units to Thoma Bravo in $10.55 Billion Deal
Apr 22, 2025 by
CPI
Claus-Dieter Ehlermann, Key Figure in EU Antitrust Policy, Dies at 94
Apr 22, 2025 by
CPI
Instagram Co-Founder Claims Zuckerberg Starved It of Resources After Acquisition
Apr 22, 2025 by
CPI
Binance Advises Governments on Crypto Rules and Digital Asset Reserves
Apr 22, 2025 by
CPI
OpenAI Eyes Chrome If DOJ Forces Google to Sell Browser, Exec Testifies
Apr 22, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Mergers in Digital Markets
Apr 21, 2025 by
CPI
Catching a Killer? Six “Genetic Markers” to Assess Nascent Competitor Acquisitions
Apr 21, 2025 by
John Taladay & Christine Ryu-Naya
Digital Decoded: Is There More Scope for Digital Mergers In 2025?
Apr 21, 2025 by
Colin Raftery, Michele Davis, Sarah Jensen & Martin Dickson
AI In the Mix – An Ever-Evolving Approach to Jurisdiction Over Digital Mergers in Europe
Apr 21, 2025 by
Ingrid Vandenborre & Ketevan Zukakishvili
Antitrust Enforcement Errors Due to a Failure to Understand Organizational Capabilities and Dynamic Competition
Apr 21, 2025 by
Magdalena Kuyterink & David J. Teece