The U.S. Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has taken action against five companies for allegedly using artificial intelligence (AI) in deceptive and unfair ways, according to Reuters. The cases reflect growing regulatory concerns about AI’s potential to mislead consumers and violate existing laws.
Three of the cases involve businesses that claimed to help consumers generate passive income through e-commerce storefronts. The FTC suspended the operations of these companies, which it said misled users about the potential earnings from AI-driven e-commerce solutions. Additionally, two settlements were reached with companies involved in AI-based services, including the popular legal service automation platform DoNotPay and the AI writing tool Rytr.
Per Reuters, DoNotPay faced scrutiny for falsely claiming to provide automated legal services. The company agreed to pay $193,000 and notify customers who subscribed between 2021 and 2023 about the limitations of its AI-powered legal tool. However, DoNotPay did not admit to any wrongdoing in the settlement. According to the FTC, the company misrepresented its service’s capabilities, raising concerns about the risks of consumers relying on AI-generated legal advice without full disclosure.
Related: FTC’s Latest Report Lays Groundwork for Stricter Data Regulations
Rytr, an AI writing tool, also came under fire for offering a feature that allowed users to generate fake product reviews. The FTC alleged that some subscribers used Rytr’s tool to produce thousands of misleading reviews with minimal effort. Rytr agreed to stop providing this service but, like DoNotPay, did not admit to any legal violations in the settlement.
“Using AI tools to trick, mislead, or defraud people is illegal,” FTC Chair Lina M. Khan said in a statement. “The FTC’s enforcement actions make clear that there is no AI exemption from the laws on the books.”
The two cases involving DoNotPay and Rytr exposed internal disagreements within the FTC about how to regulate AI technology. While all five commissioners supported taking action against false claims regarding AI services, the two Republican commissioners expressed concerns about the Rytr case, Reuters reported. They criticized the decision to target the company, suggesting that it may have broader implications for the future regulation of AI-driven content creation tools.
The FTC’s actions highlight the growing regulatory focus on the ethical use of AI in consumer-facing industries. As AI technology becomes more pervasive, the agency appears committed to ensuring that companies adhere to existing laws, regardless of the technology’s complexity or novelty.
Source: Reuters
Featured News
CVS Health Explores Potential Breakup Amid Investor Pressure: Report
Oct 3, 2024 by
CPI
DirecTV Acquires Dish TV, Creating 20 Million-Subscriber Powerhouse
Oct 3, 2024 by
CPI
South Korea Fines Kakao Mobility $54.8 Million for Anti-Competitive Practices
Oct 3, 2024 by
CPI
Google Offers Settlement in India’s Antitrust Case Regarding Smart TVs
Oct 3, 2024 by
CPI
Attorney Challenges NCAA’s $2.78 Billion Settlement in Landmark Antitrust Cases
Oct 3, 2024 by
nhoch@pymnts.com
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Refusal to Deal
Sep 27, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust’s Refusal-to-Deal Doctrine: The Emperor Has No Clothes
Sep 27, 2024 by
Erik Hovenkamp
Why All Antitrust Claims are Refusal to Deal Claims and What that Means for Policy
Sep 27, 2024 by
Ramsi Woodcock
The Aspen Misadventure
Sep 27, 2024 by
Roger Blair & Holly P. Stidham
Refusal to Deal in Antitrust Law: Evolving Jurisprudence and Business Justifications in the Align Technology Case
Sep 27, 2024 by
Timothy Hsieh