Google, Meta Platforms and TikTok have filed separate federal lawsuits seeking to overturn a California law that restricts how social media companies deliver content to children younger than 16, escalating a dispute over the government’s authority to regulate digital platforms.
The legal challenges, filed Wednesday, target Assembly Bill 1709, which seeks to reduce potentially addictive online behavior by limiting features such as algorithm-driven recommendations and automatic video playback. The legislation also requires platforms to remove accounts belonging to children that include the prohibited features, according to a Nov. 5 report by Reuters.
The companies contend that the legislation infringes on their constitutional rights by allowing state officials to dictate how online content is selected and presented. They also argue that California is improperly replacing parental decision-making with government-imposed restrictions.
At the center of the dispute is the First Amendment, which protects freedom of expression, and Section 230 of the federal Communications Decency Act, which generally provides online services with legal protections concerning content posted by users.
Meta, the parent company of Facebook and Instagram, argues that decisions about organizing and displaying billions of user-generated posts fall within its constitutionally protected editorial discretion. Google, a subsidiary of Alphabet that operates YouTube, and ByteDance-owned TikTok have raised comparable objections, Reuters reported.
California’s Push to Protect Younger Users
California Gov. Gavin Newsom signed the legislation on Sept. 10 as part of the state’s efforts to address concerns about children’s exposure to social media platforms.
The measure focuses on digital features that lawmakers believe may encourage prolonged or compulsive engagement, particularly among younger users whose online habits have become an increasing subject of public-health debate.
Newsom has defended stronger oversight of technology companies, maintaining that protecting children should be a priority when governments establish rules for digital services.
The lawsuits name California Attorney General Rob Bonta, whose office is responsible for enforcing the legislation, as the defendant. His office had not immediately responded to requests for comment as of Thursday, according to Reuters.
The three companies filed their cases in different federal courts across California. Google brought its challenge in San Jose, Meta filed in San Francisco, and TikTok initiated proceedings in Los Angeles.
Free Speech Concerns Extend Beyond Silicon Valley
Opposition to the legislation is not limited to technology companies.
The Electronic Frontier Foundation, a nonprofit organization advocating for digital rights, has criticized the measure over concerns that restrictions on children’s online access could undermine privacy and freedom of expression.
The group’s objections reflect a broader debate over whether laws designed to protect minors could also limit access to legitimate information or require intrusive methods of determining users’ ages.
Related: Meta Reaches $16.68 Billion Deal With US States Over Social-Media Risks
Supporters of stricter regulation, meanwhile, argue that companies should face stronger obligations to address product features that may encourage excessive use among children.
The competing positions underscore the legal challenge facing policymakers: establishing safeguards for young internet users without imposing restrictions that courts determine violate constitutional protections.
Growing Legal Pressure on Social Media Companies
The California dispute comes as technology companies confront mounting scrutiny over the potential effects of their products on children’s mental health.
Across the United States, state governments have adopted measures governing minors’ access to social media. Similar regulatory efforts have emerged internationally, including restrictions in Australia on social media use by children younger than 16.
The legal pressure extends beyond legislation.
In August, Meta agreed to settlements worth as much as $18 billion with nearly all U.S. states over allegations involving children’s online safety and violations of privacy and consumer protection laws. The agreements also introduced restrictions on teenagers’ use of Facebook and Instagram, Reuters previously reported.
Separately, Meta, Google, TikTok and Snap, the parent company of Snapchat, continue to face thousands of lawsuits brought by individuals, school districts and government entities.
Those cases allege that the companies developed platform features that encouraged addictive behavior among young users and contributed to mental-health problems, including anxiety and depression. The allegations remain the subject of litigation and should not be treated as established findings against all defendants.
A federal appeals court in August allowed thousands of related claims to proceed, highlighting the continuing legal uncertainty surrounding social media companies’ responsibilities toward younger audiences.
