A federal jury in California has determined that Google’s mobile app store, Google Play, holds a monopoly in the Android app distribution and payments market.
This verdict, reached after a month-long trial, deals a significant blow to the tech giant in an ongoing antitrust battle with videogame developer Epic Games, reported the Wall Street Journal.
The jury found that Google Play willfully wields monopoly power through Alphabet Inc.’s Google, engaging in anticompetitive conduct. Deliberating for less than four hours, the jurors concluded that Google’s policies are unlawful, potentially putting billions of dollars in revenue generated by the app store at risk.
US District Judge James Donato, overseeing the trial, will now decide whether Google must allow alternative payment and app distribution methods outside its own store. This decision could have far-reaching implications for the Android app ecosystem.
Related: Google’s New ‘Bard’ AI Calls Google A Monopoly
Epic Games initiated the lawsuit against Google three years ago, alleging that the tech giant had monopolized the Android app distribution market through side deals with rivals and was using its resources to hinder competition. Google defended itself by asserting that its partnerships aimed to enhance the competitiveness of Android-based phones against its market rival, Apple’s iPhone.
Epic Games, widely recognized for its popular Fortnite game, stood as the sole challenger to Alphabet at the trial. This follows settlements Google recently reached with consumers, state attorneys general, and Match Group Inc., who had all raised concerns about Google Play policies in their complaints. Notably, Epic faced a similar antitrust challenge two years ago against Apple over its app store policies, which it largely lost.
The ultimate decision by Judge Donato regarding opening up Google’s app store to alternative payment and distribution methods could reshape the dynamics of the mobile app landscape, impacting both Google and the developers relying on its platform.
Source: WSJ
Featured News
FTC and State Attorneys General Sue John Deere Over Repair Restrictions in Antitrust Case
Jan 15, 2025 by
CPI
Enbridge Wins Legal Battle Against Ducere’s Antitrust Allegations
Jan 15, 2025 by
CPI
GOP Pushes for Antitrust Authority Consolidation Under DOJ in New Legislation
Jan 15, 2025 by
CPI
Canadian Government Approves Bunge-Viterra Merger with Conditions
Jan 15, 2025 by
CPI
SEC Sues Elon Musk Over Delayed Disclosure of Twitter Stock Ownership
Jan 15, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand