General contractors Obayashi and Shimizu admitted on Tuesday, July 10, to their involvement in rigging bids for a high-speed magnetic levitation railway project, reported Japan News.
On the first day of the firms’ trial at the Tokyo District Court, senior officials of the companies respectively pleaded guilty over the case, in which they are suspected of involvement in unfair restriction of trade in violation of the Antimonopoly Law.
According to the indictment, former Taisei executive Takashi Okawa, senior Kajima official Ichiro Osawa and other officials of the four companies held meetings, roughly between April 2014 and August 2015, to predetermine winners of contracts for three sections of the planned Shinagawa and Nagoya stations, ordered by Central Japan Railway Co, or JR Tokai, for the ¥9 trillion (US$80.4 billion) Chuo Shinkansen maglev project.
Taisei Corp and Kajima Corp, which were also indicted in the case, are currently in the pretrial procedures for sorting out points at issue.
Full Content: The Japan News
Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.
Featured News
CVS Health Explores Potential Breakup Amid Investor Pressure: Report
Oct 3, 2024 by
CPI
DirecTV Acquires Dish TV, Creating 20 Million-Subscriber Powerhouse
Oct 3, 2024 by
CPI
South Korea Fines Kakao Mobility $54.8 Million for Anti-Competitive Practices
Oct 3, 2024 by
CPI
Google Offers Settlement in India’s Antitrust Case Regarding Smart TVs
Oct 3, 2024 by
CPI
Attorney Challenges NCAA’s $2.78 Billion Settlement in Landmark Antitrust Cases
Oct 3, 2024 by
nhoch@pymnts.com
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Refusal to Deal
Sep 27, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust’s Refusal-to-Deal Doctrine: The Emperor Has No Clothes
Sep 27, 2024 by
Erik Hovenkamp
Why All Antitrust Claims are Refusal to Deal Claims and What that Means for Policy
Sep 27, 2024 by
Ramsi Woodcock
The Aspen Misadventure
Sep 27, 2024 by
Roger Blair & Holly P. Stidham
Refusal to Deal in Antitrust Law: Evolving Jurisprudence and Business Justifications in the Align Technology Case
Sep 27, 2024 by
Timothy Hsieh