Kroger has taken legal action to block the Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC) internal proceedings against its planned $24.6 billion acquisition of Albertsons Cos., arguing that the process is unconstitutional. According to Bloomberg, thismove marks a significant development in what could become the largest supermarket merger in U.S. history.
Kroger filed a motion on Monday in a federal court in Ohio, seeking a preliminary injunction to stop the FTC’s administrative trial. The company contends that the case should be adjudicated in federal court rather than within the FTC’s own administrative law system, citing concerns over the separation of powers. Kroger referenced a recent Supreme Court decision in Securities and Exchange Commission v. Jarkesy, where the Court restricted the SEC’s ability to handle cases in-house, a precedent that could potentially extend to other regulatory bodies, including the FTC.
The FTC, supported by eight states and Washington, D.C., launched its challenge against the merger in February, arguing that it would lead to higher grocery prices for American consumers and reduce competition. The agency has maintained that the deal would not only harm consumers but also increase the merged company’s power over workers, potentially slowing wage growth, reported Bloomberg.
Related: Lawmakers Rally Against Kroger-Albertsons Merger
Kroger’s legal strategy is part of a broader defense against multiple challenges to the merger. In addition to the FTC’s case, the proposed acquisition faces legal opposition in a federal court in Oregon and from two state lawsuits in Colorado and Washington. Last year, a group of consumers also attempted to block the deal but were unsuccessful.
For now, the merger remains on hold pending the outcome of the antitrust lawsuit in Colorado. Kroger and Albertsons have defended their merger as a necessary move to remain competitive against larger retailers, such as Amazon.com Inc., arguing that the acquisition would enhance their ability to serve customers.
The outcome of Kroger’s latest legal maneuver could have far-reaching implications for the future of administrative law in the U.S., particularly in how regulatory agencies pursue cases against corporations.
Source: Bloomberg
Featured News
Google Knew Publishers Would Resist Ad Sales Changes, According to Internal Documents in Antitrust Trial
Sep 13, 2024 by
CPI
Federal Antitrust Trial Explores Potential Impact of Tapestry-Capri Merger
Sep 12, 2024 by
CPI
Australia Targets Big Tech with New Fines for Misinformation
Sep 12, 2024 by
CPI
Mastercard to Acquire Cybersecurity Firm Recorded Future for $2.65 Billion
Sep 12, 2024 by
CPI
Ireland Prime Minister: Apple’s €13 Billion Payment Could Fund Housing and Capital Projects
Sep 12, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Canada & Mexico
Sep 3, 2024 by
CPI
Competitive Convergence: Mexico’s 30-Year Quest for Antitrust Parity with its Northern Neighbor
Sep 3, 2024 by
Francisco Javier Núñez Melgoza
Competition and Digital Markets in North America: A Comparative Study of Antitrust Investigations in Mexico and the United States
Sep 3, 2024 by
Julio Garcia
Recent Antitrust Development in Mexico: COFECE’s Preliminary Report on Amazon and Mercado Libre
Sep 3, 2024 by
Alejandra Palacios Prieto
The Cost of Making COFECE Disappear
Sep 3, 2024 by
Mateo Fernández