Launch of New Brands in Homogeneous Products Industries with High Concentration Levels
By Hernan Herrera-Echeverry (Universidad EAFIT)
This work applies the models of Cournot and Stackelberg to a homogenous product industry with high level of concentration. The object is to use these models as decision criterion over the alternative to introduce a new mark by incumbent not leader. It is wanted to establish if to send a new mark it would be a good strategy for a firm in the search to catch greater market. It is assumed that in a market of basic and homogenous goods, the demand is not modified before the entrance of a new mark and that the market space that absorbs the new mark comes from the participation that reduces of the existing marks. The results indicate that the amount that produces each competitor again converges with the balance of Cournot, thus, does not exist additional benefit product of the launching of the new mark, if rationality assumes. Theoretically the firms with better position in the market will be seen less inclined send new marks and will prefer to maintain or to improve their positioning, the companies with less participation in the market will be most inclined to make new launchings. The conclusion is the introduction of marks in homogenous markets of basic goods little differentiated is not an interesting strategy to increase the participation in the market when the marks of those who send products are not well positioned. The mill industry of white rice on Colombia was used for illustration of conclusions.
Download Full Article: HERE
Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world
Featured News
Federal Judge Orders Google to Open Android App Store Amid Antitrust Pressure
Oct 7, 2024 by
CPI
Federal Judge Greenlights FTC’s Antitrust Lawsuit Against Amazon, Tosses Some State Claims
Oct 7, 2024 by
CPI
Supreme Court Rejects Uber and Lyft’s Appeal in California Gig Worker Suits
Oct 7, 2024 by
CPI
Supreme Court Sidesteps 5-Hour Energy Pricing Case, Allowing Antitrust Claims to Proceed
Oct 7, 2024 by
CPI
Tempur Sealy and Mattress Firm Argue FTC Proceedings Are Unconstitutional in New Suit
Oct 7, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Refusal to Deal
Sep 27, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust’s Refusal-to-Deal Doctrine: The Emperor Has No Clothes
Sep 27, 2024 by
Erik Hovenkamp
Why All Antitrust Claims are Refusal to Deal Claims and What that Means for Policy
Sep 27, 2024 by
Ramsi Woodcock
The Aspen Misadventure
Sep 27, 2024 by
Roger Blair & Holly P. Stidham
Refusal to Deal in Antitrust Law: Evolving Jurisprudence and Business Justifications in the Align Technology Case
Sep 27, 2024 by
Timothy Hsieh