Meta Platforms, the parent company of Facebook, has announced that it will not immediately join the European Union’s voluntary AI Pact, which aims to guide companies in preparing for the upcoming AI regulations. According to a Meta spokesperson, the company is currently focused on ensuring compliance with the European Union’s forthcoming AI Act, which will impose new regulations on the development and use of artificial intelligence.
Per Reuters, the AI Pact serves as an interim measure for businesses until the full implementation of the AI Act, which is set to take effect in August 2026. The legislation, agreed upon by EU lawmakers in May, is the first comprehensive set of rules worldwide aimed at overseeing AI technologies. Among other things, it will require companies to provide detailed reports on the datasets used to train their AI models.
The European Commission has encouraged companies to voluntarily adopt key aspects of the AI Act through the AI Pact before the official regulations come into force. This pact is intended to help businesses align with the forthcoming obligations, ensuring a smoother transition once the AI Act is fully implemented.
Related: Meta, Ericsson Lead Industry Push for Cohesive AI Rules in Europe
In a statement, Meta expressed support for the EU’s coordinated approach to regulating artificial intelligence, saying, “We welcome harmonized EU rules and are focusing on our compliance work under the AI Act at this time.” The spokesperson also hinted that Meta might join the AI Pact in the future, but did not provide a specific timeline.
The AI Act is poised to become a critical part of EU law, working alongside other major pieces of legislation, including the Digital Markets Act, the Digital Services Act, the Data Governance Act, and the Data Act. Together, these laws aim to regulate digital services, data management, and artificial intelligence in a rapidly evolving tech landscape.
Source: Reuters
Featured News
Judge Dismisses Antitrust Lawsuit Against Ivy League Over Athletic Scholarships
Oct 11, 2024 by
CPI
FTC and DOJ Revamp Merger Guidelines to Identify Illegal Transactions More Efficiently
Oct 11, 2024 by
CPI
US Consumer Watchdog Eyes Expansion of ‘Junk Fee’ Crackdown Ahead of 2024 Election
Oct 10, 2024 by
CPI
Brazil Proposes Reform to Competition Law Targeting Big Tech
Oct 10, 2024 by
CPI
Meta Enhances User Data Control, Resolving German Antitrust Dispute
Oct 10, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Refusal to Deal
Sep 27, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust’s Refusal-to-Deal Doctrine: The Emperor Has No Clothes
Sep 27, 2024 by
Erik Hovenkamp
Why All Antitrust Claims are Refusal to Deal Claims and What that Means for Policy
Sep 27, 2024 by
Ramsi Woodcock
The Aspen Misadventure
Sep 27, 2024 by
Roger Blair & Holly P. Stidham
Refusal to Deal in Antitrust Law: Evolving Jurisprudence and Business Justifications in the Align Technology Case
Sep 27, 2024 by
Timothy Hsieh