
In an effort to address European Union antitrust concerns, Microsoft has proposed a wider price gap between its Office suite bundled with Teams and its version sold without the chat and video application, according to sources cited by Reuters. The move comes as the tech giant attempts to avoid potential regulatory penalties from the European Commission.
The controversy surrounding Microsoft’s bundling practices dates back to 2019 when Salesforce-owned Slack lodged a complaint with the EU, arguing that tying Teams to Office created an unfair competitive advantage. More recently, in 2023, German company alfaview filed a similar grievance, adding to regulatory scrutiny. Teams, initially introduced as a free addition to Office 365 in 2017, eventually replaced Skype for Business and gained widespread adoption, particularly during the COVID-19 pandemic when video conferencing saw a surge in demand.
Per Reuters, Microsoft previously sought to ease concerns by unbundling Teams from Office in 2023, offering a version without Teams for 2 euros less than the bundled package, while selling the standalone Teams app for 5 euros per month. However, EU regulators have continued to investigate whether these measures sufficiently address competition concerns.
To further mitigate regulatory scrutiny, Microsoft has now proposed increasing the price difference between Office with and without Teams, potentially giving competitors a better chance to attract customers with alternative solutions. Additionally, sources told Reuters that Microsoft has offered improved interoperability terms, making it easier for rival companies to integrate their products and compete more effectively.
Related: EU Regulators to Rule on AMD’s $4.9 Billion ZT Systems Buy Soon
Despite Microsoft’s efforts, the European Commission has yet to make a formal decision on whether the latest proposal is adequate. According to Reuters, the Commission has sought feedback from various companies, with responses due this week. Depending on the outcome, regulators may proceed with a formal market test to assess the effectiveness of Microsoft’s concessions.
The stakes are significant, as Microsoft has faced substantial fines from the EU in the past. Over the last two decades, the company has incurred penalties totaling 2.2 billion euros ($2.3 billion) for bundling-related antitrust violations. EU competition authorities have the power to impose fines of up to 10% of a company’s global annual revenue if they find evidence of anticompetitive practices.
According to Reuters, should the European Commission accept Microsoft’s proposal without imposing a fine or a ruling of misconduct, it would allow regulators to allocate more resources to ongoing investigations into other tech giants, such as Apple and Google. Both the EU watchdog and Microsoft declined to comment on the matter.
Source: Reuters
Featured News
Australia’s Major Supermarkets Face Scrutiny Over Profit Margins Amid Rising Prices
Mar 21, 2025 by
CPI
Fired FTC Commissioners Warn of Potential White House Influence Over Mergers
Mar 20, 2025 by
CPI
Dr. Matthew Backus Joins Compass Lexecon as an Affiliate
Mar 20, 2025 by
CPI
UK to Boost Broadband Competition While Capping Openreach Charges, Says Ofcom
Mar 20, 2025 by
CPI
Singapore Competition Watchdog Yet to Receive Formal Notification on Grab-GoTo Merger
Mar 20, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Self-Preferencing
Feb 26, 2025 by
CPI
Platform Self-Preferencing: Focusing the Policy Debate
Feb 26, 2025 by
Michael Katz
Weaponized Opacity: Self-Preferencing in Digital Audience Measurement
Feb 26, 2025 by
Thomas Hoppner & Philipp Westerhoff
Self-Preferencing: An Economic Literature-Based Assessment Advocating a Case-By-Case Approach and Compliance Requirements
Feb 26, 2025 by
Patrice Bougette & Frederic Marty
Self-Preferencing in Adjacent Markets
Feb 26, 2025 by
Muxin Li