Farnsworth’s complaint is part of a growing wave of legal challenges aimed at major tech firms over their use of copyrighted materials to develop AI technologies. Several prominent authors, including Ta-Nehisi Coates, former Arkansas governor Mike Huckabee and comedian Sarah Silverman, have brought similar claims against Meta. These lawsuits, like Farnsworth’s, accuse the company of improperly using their works to train its AI without obtaining the necessary licenses.
The lawsuit was filed by the prominent class-action firm Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein. This comes on the heels of a federal judge allowing well-known litigator David Boies, along with other lawyers from Boies Schiller Flexner, to join the legal team representing authors in an earlier lawsuit against Meta. The addition of Boies brings significant legal firepower to the plaintiffs’ side.
Meta has yet to publicly respond to the new allegations, and representatives for both the company and Farnsworth’s legal team did not immediately issue any statements when contacted by Reuters.
Read more: Greek Regulator Investigates Novartis for Alleged Unfair Practices
Farnsworth’s lawsuit highlights the increasing tension between copyright holders and tech companies, as generative AI systems like Meta’s LLaMA rely on vast amounts of data, often including text from books, music and art, to learn how to generate human-like responses. Many in the creative industries argue that such use amounts to infringement, while tech companies have maintained that these practices are protected under the copyright doctrine of “fair use.”
The outcome of these cases could have significant implications for the AI industry, which relies heavily on training models with large datasets. If courts rule against companies like Meta, it could result in stricter limitations on how AI systems are developed and trained, impacting the future of AI development.
Source: Reuters.
Featured News
Judge Dismisses Antitrust Lawsuit Against Ivy League Over Athletic Scholarships
Oct 11, 2024 by
CPI
FTC and DOJ Revamp Merger Guidelines to Identify Illegal Transactions More Efficiently
Oct 11, 2024 by
CPI
US Consumer Watchdog Eyes Expansion of ‘Junk Fee’ Crackdown Ahead of 2024 Election
Oct 10, 2024 by
CPI
Brazil Proposes Reform to Competition Law Targeting Big Tech
Oct 10, 2024 by
CPI
Meta Enhances User Data Control, Resolving German Antitrust Dispute
Oct 10, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Refusal to Deal
Sep 27, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust’s Refusal-to-Deal Doctrine: The Emperor Has No Clothes
Sep 27, 2024 by
Erik Hovenkamp
Why All Antitrust Claims are Refusal to Deal Claims and What that Means for Policy
Sep 27, 2024 by
Ramsi Woodcock
The Aspen Misadventure
Sep 27, 2024 by
Roger Blair & Holly P. Stidham
Refusal to Deal in Antitrust Law: Evolving Jurisprudence and Business Justifications in the Align Technology Case
Sep 27, 2024 by
Timothy Hsieh