Oasis fans who purchased tickets through Ticketmaster may soon be eligible for refunds following growing scrutiny over the company’s “dynamic pricing” model, which has left many concert-goers frustrated.
According to the Daily Star, frustrated concertgoers may be entitled to refunds after Ticketmaster’s pricing policy led to widespread consumer complaints.
The issue stems from a system introduced by Ticketmaster in 2022, which adjusts ticket prices based on demand. Per Daily Star, this meant that tickets for Oasis shows were selling for hundreds of pounds more than their original advertised prices as soon as they went on sale. Many fans who rushed to secure tickets were shocked to find that prices had surged in real-time due to the overwhelming demand.
Ticketmaster has defended the practice, claiming it was designed to curb ticket scalping and ensure that a larger share of revenue goes to the artists. However, consumer lawyer Dean Dunham, quoted by MailOnline, raised concerns about the legality of dynamic pricing. Dunham noted that this practice could potentially violate consumer protection laws, specifically those related to “bait advertising.”
Related: Antitrust Pressure Mounts as Oasis Fans Clash with Ticketmaster
Under the Consumer Protection Regulation, bait advertising occurs when a trader advertises a product or service at a specific price to attract consumers, but then increases the price when demand spikes. According to Daily Star, Dunham believes Ticketmaster’s dynamic pricing might fall into this category, making it a potentially unfair practice.
While Ticketmaster argues that its system benefits both artists and fans by combating touts, Dunham remains skeptical, suggesting that the approach may contravene consumer rights. As more fans voice their frustrations, legal challenges could force the company to reconsider its pricing strategy—or even provide refunds to affected ticket buyers.
This isn’t the first time Ticketmaster has faced backlash over its dynamic pricing model, but with Oasis fans at the center of the current controversy, the company may have to address growing calls for reform. As per the Daily Star, potential refunds could be on the horizon, signaling a broader push for consumer fairness in the ticketing industry.
Featured News
Judge Dismisses Antitrust Lawsuit Against Ivy League Over Athletic Scholarships
Oct 11, 2024 by
CPI
FTC and DOJ Revamp Merger Guidelines to Identify Illegal Transactions More Efficiently
Oct 11, 2024 by
CPI
US Consumer Watchdog Eyes Expansion of ‘Junk Fee’ Crackdown Ahead of 2024 Election
Oct 10, 2024 by
CPI
Brazil Proposes Reform to Competition Law Targeting Big Tech
Oct 10, 2024 by
CPI
Meta Enhances User Data Control, Resolving German Antitrust Dispute
Oct 10, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Refusal to Deal
Sep 27, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust’s Refusal-to-Deal Doctrine: The Emperor Has No Clothes
Sep 27, 2024 by
Erik Hovenkamp
Why All Antitrust Claims are Refusal to Deal Claims and What that Means for Policy
Sep 27, 2024 by
Ramsi Woodcock
The Aspen Misadventure
Sep 27, 2024 by
Roger Blair & Holly P. Stidham
Refusal to Deal in Antitrust Law: Evolving Jurisprudence and Business Justifications in the Align Technology Case
Sep 27, 2024 by
Timothy Hsieh