Qualcomm has initiated discussions with Intel about a potential acquisition, a source familiar with the matter revealed on Friday. The deal, which could significantly reshape the technology sector, faces numerous challenges but has sparked interest within the industry. According to Reuters, Qualcomm CEO Cristiano Amon is leading the negotiations, which are still in the early stages.
Per Reuters, Amon has been exploring various options for a possible acquisition of Intel, a chipmaker with over five decades of history. Earlier this month, Qualcomm was reported to have shown interest in parts of Intel’s design business, specifically its PC design unit, though executives have been evaluating the company’s entire business portfolio. Despite these efforts, Qualcomm has yet to submit a formal offer, and the discussions remain confidential, according to a third source.
Intel, once the world’s most valuable chipmaker, has seen a sharp decline in its fortunes, with shares losing nearly 60% of their value since the beginning of the year. Qualcomm’s approach comes at a vulnerable moment for Intel, potentially positioning the San Diego-based company to capitalize on Intel’s weakened position.
Related: Qualcomm Loses Legal Battle Over EU Antitrust Fine, Court Slightly Reduces Penalty
The prospect of a deal has already affected market movements. Intel’s stock rose 3.3% after the news, while Qualcomm saw a 2.9% drop in its share price. However, should a formal bid materialize, the acquisition is expected to face regulatory scrutiny from antitrust authorities in the U.S., Europe, and China. Qualcomm might be required to divest some of Intel’s assets to clear these hurdles.
If the acquisition attempt moves forward, it could mark one of the largest in tech history. Qualcomm’s pursuit of Intel echoes the 2018 takeover attempt by Broadcom, which sought to acquire Qualcomm for $142 billion. That deal was ultimately blocked by then-President Donald Trump due to national security concerns.
As the discussions continue, both companies remain tight-lipped, and it remains to be seen whether a formal offer will emerge or if regulatory concerns will hinder any potential agreement.
Source: Reuters
Featured News
Judge Dismisses Antitrust Lawsuit Against Ivy League Over Athletic Scholarships
Oct 11, 2024 by
CPI
FTC and DOJ Revamp Merger Guidelines to Identify Illegal Transactions More Efficiently
Oct 11, 2024 by
CPI
US Consumer Watchdog Eyes Expansion of ‘Junk Fee’ Crackdown Ahead of 2024 Election
Oct 10, 2024 by
CPI
Brazil Proposes Reform to Competition Law Targeting Big Tech
Oct 10, 2024 by
CPI
Meta Enhances User Data Control, Resolving German Antitrust Dispute
Oct 10, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Refusal to Deal
Sep 27, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust’s Refusal-to-Deal Doctrine: The Emperor Has No Clothes
Sep 27, 2024 by
Erik Hovenkamp
Why All Antitrust Claims are Refusal to Deal Claims and What that Means for Policy
Sep 27, 2024 by
Ramsi Woodcock
The Aspen Misadventure
Sep 27, 2024 by
Roger Blair & Holly P. Stidham
Refusal to Deal in Antitrust Law: Evolving Jurisprudence and Business Justifications in the Align Technology Case
Sep 27, 2024 by
Timothy Hsieh